A deeper look at African art at BMA

February 05, 2006|By GLENN MCNATT | GLENN MCNATT,SUN ART CRITIC

The Baltimore Museum of Art houses a stellar collection of African art that includes more than 2,000 pieces, most dating from the 19th and early 20th centuries.

Yet a visitor encountering these works in the museum today may be forgiven for experiencing a certain amount of confusion. The African objects share a gallery with those of other "primitive" cultures -- Native American, Oceanic, Asian and Pre-Columbian, for example -- but it's not clear what the relationship between them is supposed to be or how it should be interpreted.

That may change, however, now that Karen Milbourne, the BMA's new curator of African art, is planning a major reinstallation of the African collection, tentatively scheduled for 2007.

Milbourne, who has conducted extensive field work in Africa as well as taught the history of African art, says she envisions a restructuring of the African galleries that emphasizes the artworks' meaning for the people who created them rather than the more usual chronological or geographical treatments.

"Historically, museums have followed a geographic approach that emphasizes stylistic differences," Milbourne says. "I thought we should go with a series of broad themes -- for example, royalty, education, politics and religion.

"That would also allow us to present the objects' provenance -- how they traveled from Africa to the BMA, as well as their relationship to contemporary art practices in Africa and the way our objects have accumulated new meanings as time passes," Milbourne says.

The goal of the project is to make the art more accessible to contemporary audiences. It's also a way for the museum to explore new ways of answering fundamental questions about African art.

How, for example, does one go about looking at African art? The issue is more complicated than it may seem at first, not only because African art is incredibly diverse -- representing 53 countries and nearly 30,000 years of history -- but also because traditionally African art has been viewed almost exclusively through the prism of European modernism.

When people think of African art they are apt to imagine ceremonial masks, or perhaps the bright geometries of African textiles and pottery. But there is much more to the tradition of African art than these familiar examples.

In fact, the tremendous diversity of works produced by African artists makes it difficult even for scholars to agree on a single definition of African art.

Does it, for example, include the art of ancient Egypt as well as the countries of sub-Saharan Africa? What about the paleolithic rock paintings of South Africa, or contemporary photography from Nigeria? Do works produced by diaspora artists in the United States, the Caribbean, Latin America and Europe qualify as African art? All these questions remain unanswered.

Most museums, Milbourne says, arbitrarily limit their African art acquisitions to works created before 1940, on the assumption that after that the influence of industrialization, urbanization and commercial pressures became the main impetus for art-making in Africa.

But the production of artworks for religious and ceremonial use has persisted in Africa to the present. One can hardly conceive of a Western art museum excluding virtually everything from the past six decades as somehow "inauthentic," though in many museums that remains the case with African art.

Spain's Pablo Picasso and other early modernists were greatly influenced by the exotic forms of African masks, which they incorporated into their own works as symbols of the unconscious mind. European modernism "aestheticized" African art -- that is, it made its forms visible for the first time as art rather than as artifact. But its very emphasis on the formal qualities of art precluded an appreciation of the objects' meaning for the people who created them.

(Picasso boasted he didn't need to know anything about African masks except how they looked. To him the cultural meaning of the masks -- as expressions of religious, political or moral ideas -- was irrelevant.)

Yet aesthetics may have been the least part of the meaning of African artworks for the people who used them.

African masks, for example, were meant to be viewed not as static sculpture but rather as elements in a complex ritual ceremony that included dance, costume, music and theater.

Without some knowledge of these broader meanings, the ability to appreciate the achievement of African artists is severely limited. Take, for example, the magnificent D'mba mask made by the Baga people of Guinea-Conakry on the western coast of Africa that is one of the jewels of the BMA's collection.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.