Shall we dance?

In Joe Wright's half-right modern take on Jane Austen's classic, Keira Knightley makes nary a misstep.

Review B-

November 11, 2005|By MICHAEL SRAGOW | MICHAEL SRAGOW,SUN MOVIE CRITIC

For [Jane] Austen," writes scholar Robert Polhemus, "love, like dance, ought to be a rational pursuit, leading to what is pleasurable, useful, and beautiful." He compares Elizabeth Bennet and Mr. Darcy in Pride and Prejudice to Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers doing "Never Gonna Dance" in Swing Time -- they "begin by trying to keep from dancing, but end up joined together in fluid, unified, loving, and lovely motion." He imagines "Elizabeth's motion would be both lively and elegantly poised. Like ballet, good and rational love is a balancing act."

Director Joe Wright's new movie version of Pride and Prejudice is more Gene Kelly than Fred Astaire: more earthy and athletic than balletic. It's not what you expect from the classic tale of a smart single girl without money who falls into love-hate with a wealthy man who seems to be a snob and a prig, at a time when most women needed marriage to achieve independence from their own nuclear families.

Pride and Prejudice (Focus Features) Starring Keira Knightley and Matthew MacFadyen. Directed by Joe Wright. Rated PG. Time 127 minutes.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.