Important lessons from one George W. to another

October 26, 2005|By CAL THOMAS

ARLINGTON, VA. -- Near the end of his magnificent book 1776, historian David McCullough writes this about George Washington: "He was not a brilliant strategist or tactician, not a gifted orator, not an intellectual. At several crucial moments he had shown marked indecisiveness. He had made serious mistakes in judgment."

Sound familiar? That's what critics of today's George W. say about him.

Mr. McCullough concludes, "But experience had been his great teacher from boyhood, and in this his greatest test, he learned steadily from experience."

Has the contemporary George W. learned from experience?

In what could be a critical week for the Bush administration, special counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald might indict top White House aide Karl Rove, along with I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff.

If that happens, the media and their ideological friends in the Democratic Party might raise the ghost of Richard Nixon, asserting that whatever errors, indiscretions or illegalities these men may have committed are akin to Watergate. That probably won't fly for long, and the Democrats, given their recent history of defending Bill Clinton from moral and ethical indiscretions (including lying under oath), don't have much credibility in that area.

But even though the Democrats are in disarray and have no moral standing or ideas, it's not an excuse for the White House to ride out potentially bad publicity and refuse to do something to halt the continuing slide in public approval ratings.

What to do? First, the president should shake up his staff, bringing in new people who have vision, experience and unquestioned integrity.

Then he should say what he thinks it means to be a conservative Republican, which once meant smaller, cheaper and less-intrusive government. Under Republicans, the cost and reach of government have expanded, including gobs of new money for education and new entitlement programs that would shame a New Dealer. A real conservative would try to reverse this trend.

The president should announce something dramatic regarding the war in Iraq. He should speak about America's objective as victory, instead of the withdrawal of U.S. troops once Iraqi forces are ready to take over. To that end, the president should announce a plan to increase the size of the Army, which could and should have been done as early as 2001. If it had been done as late as 2003, new troops would now be available to help crush the Sunni-Arab opposition and to convince them we have no intention of withdrawing until the job is complete. They have based their hopes on America cutting and running.

Following through on his pledge to do something serious about illegal immigration would also go a long way to rekindling support for the president among conservatives.

If Harriet Miers withdraws her name for consideration as a Supreme Court justice, or if her nomination is defeated in the Senate, a known conservative would be just the ticket for rousing the base.

President Bush must redefine himself publicly and for his own sake. What does he see beyond the face in the mirror and beneath the words others write for him? Where are his convictions and positions on which he will not compromise or falter? He must constantly restate what is at stake domestically and in the war against radical Islam, and he must never compromise these principles.

Concerning that other George W., Mr. McCullough writes, "Above all, Washington never forgot what was at stake and he never gave up." A lot is riding on whether this George W. has that same attitude and vision.

Cal Thomas' syndicated column appears Wednesdays in The Sun.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.