Q&A with Mike Preston

Q and A with ...Mike Preston

Sun columnist answers questions about the Ravens' win over the Browns

ravens/football

October 17, 2005|By BALTIMORESUN.COM STAFF

J.Y., Villanova, Pa.: Mike, thanks for taking the time to answer our questions. Now that we're sitting in third place, we're in line to really play some smashmouth ball against our division rivals. If we keep playing more like we did in the first half against the Browns rather than the second half, how far do you think we will go? Thanks!

Mike Preston: The best case scenario for the team appears to be 9-7, 8-8, and 7-9. The Ravens blew two golden opportunities losing to Detroit and Tennessee, losses that will probably haunt them at the end. The Ravens finally won Sunday, which is a good thing considering all the controversy that has surrounded the team during the past week. But it was only the Browns. Let's keep it in perspective. The Ravens have like 11 Pro Bowl players on the roster, the Browns have like zero. You never get too high with the highs or too low with the lows. You just try to stay on an even keel.

If the Ravens really want to make an impression, go beat a quality team. Based on talent matchups and their schedule, the Ravens should be 4-1. So far, they've underachieved. We'll know more in the upcoming weeks, but we won't learn a lot from the sorry Bears next week.

Joe, Baltimore: Mike, is it psyche or something? The Ravens play well at home, showing they have the potential to win football games with good defense and an offense that avoids turning the ball over. But why can't they carry this amount of intensity on the road?

Mike Preston: Maybe we should schedule the Jets and Browns at home every week. Let's see, in the Ravens two home wins, they beat a team that had one arm tied behind its back and couldn't throw, and beat a team that couldn't run and didn't hand the ball off on a running play until the second quarter. Teams win at home for numerous reasons. They don't travel, they're in familiar surroundings, they don't have to deal with the crowd and they're more accountable because they're on home turf. Good teams win anywhere: home, on the road, in the parking lot at Kmart. For some reason, in the last two years, the Ravens haven't gotten it done. But there's a good chance they can pick up a 'W' Sunday against Da Bears (who are only a little better than Da Browns), another team that has one arm tied behind its back because their quarterback is a rookie.

PFC John Milway, Bel Air: I'm a soldier currently in Iraq and have been unable to see any Ravens football, but I have one question: Is Jamal Lewis finished? The way his stats look, I'm thinking we should just let him leave and not even franchise him. Can we trade him?

Mike Preston: If the Ravens are going to trade him, they better do it soon because he is in the last year of his contract. It's hard to read Lewis. He has the explosion, but is indecisive. He just seems to be a tad slow when it comes to cutting and accelerating. We're only five games into the season, so there is time to make a decision. Before the critics come down on Lewis too hard, they should look at the Ravens offensive line. There aren't a lot of holes either. Lewis and Chester Taylor make the offensive line look a lot better than it really is.

Mark, Catonsville: Do you think the Ravens should sign Chester Taylor to a long-term deal and let Jamal Lewis walk after the season? Taylor has always been productive, would be cheaper to lock up, and I'd hate to see him pull a Priest Holmes on us. What do you think?

Mike Preston: Before the Ravens choose Taylor over Lewis, they better decide what kind of offense they want to run. In their present form, Lewis is the better fit because the Ravens have a north and south running game, and they need a power back like Lewis at halfback. If the Ravens keep Taylor, there has to be some modification because he can't carry the ball 30 to 35 times a game. Holmes is successful in Kansas City because the offense is diversified. Holmes can line up outside or in the slot as a receiver. The Chiefs run a lot more screens, and pull their guards more. Holmes is more of a shifty runner than Lewis. There will be much more input than what we just see on Sundays before final decisions on both backs are reached.

Zac, Ann Arbor, Mich.: How much stock should we put into Michael Irvin saying Ray Lewis would quit if the offense doesn't start doing something? I've noticed that Ray has been sitting by himself on the sidelines and does not appear to be to friendly with the rest of the team.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.