Warlords among candidates in Afghanistan's parliament

Election set today for body, 34 provincial councils

September 18, 2005|By Paul Watson | Paul Watson,LOS ANGELES TIMES

KABUL, Afghanistan - Staring down from campaign posters plastered around town, a familiar face taunts Zulmai Khan.

It is Abdul Rauf Mukhtar, a candidate for Afghanistan's parliament in northern Takhar province. He is also the man Khan accuses of killing five members of his family 10 years ago.

Like many Afghans, Khan thought the Electoral Complaints Commission would prevent warlords from running in today's election for the 249-seat lower house of parliament and 34 provincial councils.

But the commission of three foreigners and two Afghans may act only against convicted criminals, those with current ties to militias, or violators of election rules.

And Mukhtar, at least in the eyes of Afghanistan's justice system, is none of the above.

"What exists in the law and what people expect are very different," said Mohammed Farid Hamidi, an Afghan member of the complaints commission. "The standard of proof [for disqualification] is too high."

On Monday, the commission banished 28 candidates, mostly because they had ties to illegal armed groups.

But warlords remain largely beyond the short reach of justice.

Afghanistan's courts barely function after more than 25 years of war and occupation and are deeply corrupt.

Khan said he couldn't seek justice a decade ago because Mukhtar was the local police chief.

"There were no rules then, and no law. Anybody who had power could kill people he hated, and there was nothing we could do," Khan said. "Nobody listened to us then, and no one is listening to us now."

Khan alleges that Mukhtar killed two of his brothers, Daoud and Nowruz, and his nephew, a cousin and an aunt's grandson.

"He shot one of my brothers in the bazaar, in front of everyone, and then he went to my house and killed my other brother," Khan said by satellite phone from the remote northern town of Ishkamish.

"The murders of my brothers are very famous in our area," he said. "Everyone knows about it. This person destroyed the lives of many people when he was a [militia] commander. And he will destroy the whole country if he becomes a member of parliament."

Mukhtar was a local commander of the Jamaat-i-Islami militia faction, which dominated the Northern Alliance, which helped U.S. forces defeat the Taliban government in late 2001.

The faction has disarmed and become a political party, headed by former presidential candidate Yunis Qanooni. It is expected to do well in today's election for provincial councils and the national Wolesi Jirga, or House of the People.

Mukhtar said that Khan's allegations were lies spread by political opponents, and he contended that he had never killed anyone in the street. He said he remembered that Khan's brothers were executed on the orders of a traditional council of elders, or shura, but said he did not know who carried out the sentence.

"If I have killed anybody or shot anybody, it was always the order of the court or the elders on the district shura," the candidate said from Ishkamish.

Mukhtar said the shura found the brothers guilty of kidnapping women and children from a local Quranic school, called a madrasa.

Khan says that his brothers had done nothing wrong and that there was no reason to kill any of his family members.

Like most of the crimes committed during more than two decades of war in Afghanistan, the truth of what happened to Khan's relatives might never be determined.

Unlike other regions that endured brutal conflicts, such as Rwanda, Sierra Leone, the former Yugoslavia, East Timor and now Iraq, Afghanistan has seen no international effort to investigate or prosecute war criminals.

Instead, many of the people who might have faced a court have been rewarded with positions as police chiefs, military commanders and politicians, said Mehdad Noorani, editor and publisher of the weekly Taraqi.

"I think no other country has been betrayed as Afghanistan is being now," Noorani said.

Noorani says that as many as 350 of 5,800 candidates in this weekend's vote are criminals who shouldn't be allowed to hold office in a democracy.

Only two of the candidates dismissed Monday by the complaints commission, a mid-level Kabul gangster named Qumandan Didar and Gul Hussein Khel Baghlani, a regional warlord, are suspected of significant crimes.

Haji Almas, another Kabul-area gangster who police suspect is running major heroin, kidnapping and burglary rings, is a candidate for parliament despite numerous complaints about him to the commission.

Seventeen candidates were disqualified in July before ballots were printed, but it's too late to strike the names of the latest rejections, which means any vote for them is wasted.

"We are not a criminal court or a transitional justice body," Grant Kippen, the commission's Canadian chairman, said Monday. "Ultimately, it is the right of voters in this country to choose, in a few days' time, who will represent them in the Wolesi Jirga and provincial councils."

The Los Angeles Times is a Tribune Publishing newspaper.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.