Improvement seen in Russian security

Lugar says cooperation picks up in joint effort at nuclear weapons sites

August 27, 2005|By David Holley | David Holley,LOS ANGELES TIMES

MOSCOW - Joint U.S.-Russian efforts to boost security against potential attacks on Russian storage sites for nuclear warheads have accelerated in recent months, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said here yesterday.

Sen. Richard G. Lugar credited the stepped-up pace of activity to a new commitment by Russian President Vladimir V. Putin after a February summit with President Bush in Slovakia.

"We've had an agreement for inspections at the warhead storage sites that has broken the logjam of misunderstanding there," the Indiana Republican said at a Moscow news conference. "This is an important breakthrough."

Under the 1991 Nunn-Lugar Act, which established the Cooperative Threat Reduction program, the United States has spent billions of dollars to help destroy nuclear warheads, ballistic missiles, bombers, submarines and other weapons in former Soviet states.

But efforts to work together in ensuring that terrorists could not obtain nuclear weapons by raiding Russian storage facilities have been largely stymied by Russian unwillingness to allow U.S. monitoring of how American taxpayer money would be used to upgrade security, Lugar said at the news conference and an interview later.

In June, however, the Russians presented the U.S. with a list of 25 to 30 nuclear warhead storage sites and said three U.S. inspections would be allowed at each, Lugar said.

"Terrorists have become tougher," Lugar said. "This is a Russian-American response to toughen the targets too. We're not asleep, either."

Lugar said that until the February summit, "things were, if not on dead center, certainly not going very fast in this area."

"I think that President Bush and President Putin, taking a look at the war on terror - and this is the point we're making anecdotally about how terrorists sometimes are becoming more proficient in their craft - I think the two presidents recognized we needed to upgrade so we were more proficient in our protection," Lugar said.

"The Russians in the past had placed severe limitations upon inspection of the storage sites, so this was an important breakthrough. The Russians in essence are saying, `Your privileges to inspect are not unlimited, but at least you have three opportunities.'"

Lugar is in Russia with Sen. Barack Obama, an Illinois Democrat, to visit several sites associated with the program.

On previous visits, Lugar said, he has run into situations in which Americans were denied access to U.S.-funded activities.

"There might be a commander who is just uncooperative, who wasn't really eager to see Americans around there," Lugar said. "So we had to argue diplomatically that, after all, this was cooperative, we were providing contractors and various other support, so we felt that for the American taxpayers we ought to take a look. This was not always agreed to."

Lugar recalled visiting a Russian warhead storage facility about five years ago.

"Literally we saw the warheads sort of like coffins, lying side by side, with labels at the top indicating when the warhead was constructed, what kind of servicing, how long it might have efficacy," he said.

Lugar said he believed it is important for the momentum of the program to continue the work, citing as an example U.S. help in construction of a plant in the Siberian town of Shchuchye to destroy chemical weapons.

"We believe it's in our best interests to continue to work with the Russians and other countries to fund the Shchuchye project, which I understand will finally be completed in about 2008, because there's still 40,000 metric tons of nerve gas or other dangerous chemical weapons out there that Russia has pledged to destroy but physically found it's unable to do so by itself," he said.

The Los Angeles Times is a Tribune Publishing newspaper.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.