Surprise casting gives readers a jolt

Fans of comics and novels revolt if actors fail to match preconceptions


July 10, 2005|By Chris Kaltenbach | Chris Kaltenbach,SUN MOVIE CRITIC

Vivien Leigh as Scarlett O'Hara? Surely, you jest. She's no Southerner! Why, she's not even American!

Michael Keaton as Batman? The Dark Knight? A hero who's all brooding menace and pent-up fury, being played by a comedian? Pass the smelling salts.

Jessica Alba as Sue Storm, the Invisible Girl/Woman? A dark-haired, exotic beauty playing the blond, WASP-y Sue? Must be a mistake.

Hollywood has made some seemingly odd casting choices over the years, and the outcry has been fierce. Obsessed fans, emotionally vested in characters that many of them have grown up with, all have in mind a certain image of their heroes. And woe to the casting director who runs askew of those preconceptions.

"You don't want to be absolutely opposite of what people are expecting in a role," says John Papsidera, casting director on both Batman Begins and Catwoman. "But I do think it's more important to focus on the essence of those characters and someone who can convey them, and not just be the physical embodiment of them."

Alba, cast as the distaff member of the Fantastic Four, which opened in theaters Friday, is the latest in a line of actors seemingly cast against type - English women (Leigh) cast as Southern belles (Gone With the Wind, 1939), comics (Keaton) cast as tragic heroes (Batman, 1989), box-office studs (Tom Cruise) cast as androgynous, blood-sucking vampires (Interview With the Vampire, 1994).

She's also the latest actor to endure a firestorm of protest from over-protective fans. "Why ... can't Hollywood stick to the comic book version of Sue?" one fan wrote in a posting on the Internet Move Database ( "It is not hard to find someone who looks almost exactly like how Sue is `supposed' to look!"

Such negativity doesn't come as a surprise to Avi Arad, president and CEO of Marvel Studios, the motion-picture arm of Marvel Comics - home to The Fantastic Four since 1962, when the characters were created by comic-book legends Stan Lee and Jack Kirby.

"I expect the fans to be negative from the get-go, on everything," says Arad, with the weariness of someone who wishes people, just once, wouldn't meet his expectations. "With X-Men, Patrick Stewart as Prof. X was on the money, people got that. But all the rest [of the actors], it took time to bring the fans around. With Fantastic Four, Michael Chiklis as The Thing, which was to us the perfect choice, I think they got it." For the rest of the cast, he says, "we were waiting" for fans to get with the program.

Surprising Scarlett

In many cases, they do. When producer David O. Selznick was preparing Gone With the Wind in the late 1930s, he initiated a nationwide casting call to find the right Scarlett. Devoted readers of Margaret Mitchell's book, who had clamored almost unanimously for Clark Gable to play the rapscallion Rhett Butler, couldn't agree on an actress for the tempestuous Scarlett; everyone from Carole Lombard to Katharine Hepburn had their supporters.

Few fans, however, were satisfied when Leigh, a British actress best known, if at all, as the paramour of Laurence Olivier, was cast in the plum role. Selznick proved smarter than them all, however; Leigh won an Oscar, as well as the hearts of moviegoers on both sides of the Mason-Dixon line.

A similar turnabout came when Cruise was cast as the undead Lestat in the film version of Anne Rice's Interview With the Vampire. Only this time, the loudest objections were coming not from the fans, but from the author herself. Cruise, she said, "is no more my vampire Lestat than Edward G. Robinson is Rhett Butler." In a separate interview, Rice cut down Cruise even further, saying she would have preferred the role go to "a great actor of appropriate voice and height."

"It was very upsetting," Cruise said of Rice's non-support. "I mean, listen, it really hurt my feelings."

All this happened before Rice saw the finished movie; after she did, her tone changed noticeably. On Sept. 23, 1994, she took out a two-page ad of contrition in Daily Variety to say, among other things, "The charm, the humor and invincible innocence which I cherish in my beloved hero Lestat are all alive in Tom Cruise's courageous performance."

Winning them over

Still, a novel's fans are novices in the preconceived-notions department when compared to comic-book zealots. They, after all, have not just mind's-eye descriptions of their heroes to work with, but also drawings. And when Warner Bros. announced in 1988 that Michael Keaton would be playing Batman, you would have thought a Martian had been cast in the role.

Petitions were initiated, begging that someone else - anyone else - be considered. "He's just completely wrong for the part," one Philadelphia comic-store owner said. "Everybody in here laughed when they read about Keaton."

Again, the furor abated once the film came out. Keaton proved just fine as the taciturn Dark Knight, and the move pulled in $251.2 million. Three sequels later, with George Clooney playing Batman, Keaton was looking pretty good.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.