Italians to vote on law limiting medically assisted pregnancy

Pope supports it

foes say it dooms research

June 12, 2005|By Tracy Wilkinson | Tracy Wilkinson,LOS ANGELES TIMES

ROME - Mika Hayama got in just under the wire, becoming pregnant a couple of months before Italy's highly restrictive law on medically assisted reproduction went into effect last year.

Francesca Pietra was not as lucky. She plans to join a wave of "procreation tourism," as it is called here, and travel to another European country where she can pay for a donated egg that she hopes will produce a baby.

"This is the only chance I have," Pietra said.

Italians will go to the polls today and tomorrow to vote on a referendum that would repeal the fertility measure, which severely limits the ways women can use modern science to get pregnant.

The law, approved overwhelmingly by Roman Catholic politicians in Parliament, also bans research on embryonic cells, denies in vitro fertilization to all but a few women and forbids the donation of sperm and eggs, and the freezing of embryos.

Opponents say Italy, after years of being the "Wild West" of reproductive science, has the most inhibiting law of its kind in Europe.

The referendum has redrawn traditional political lines in Italy and led to the Roman Catholic Church's intervention in balloting in ways not seen here for decades.

Pope urges boycott

Pope Benedict XVI joined the Italian bishops conference in calling on voters to boycott the vote.

"It is very important," Benedict said Monday, "that Christian families speak out publicly on the inviolability of human life from conception to its natural term, the unique and irreplaceable value of the family based on marriage."

It was the fourth time in less than two weeks that the new pope had addressed the subject, leaving no doubt about his instructions to voters.

For the referendum to be valid, more than half of the electorate must vote, so abstaining is the easiest way to ensure that the law remains in effect.

Politicians from the left and right, primarily men, say they will heed the church's call. But many women across the political spectrum have campaigned to rally voters to vote against the law.

Widespread debate

The debate has consumed Italians, dominating television talk shows and newspapers. Billboards across Rome urge "Abstention!" or decry embryonic research to fight diseases such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's. "We are all ex-embryos," says another.

Supporters of the law say they are preserving human life; opponents say the law places the rights of embryos above those of women and dooms scientific research.

Rita Levi-Montalcini, who won the Nobel Prize in physiology/medicine in 1986, called for the law to be overturned, arguing that stem cell research and genetic engineering "promise a better future for mankind."

On the opposite side, writer Oriana Fallaci warned of the potential for "Frankenstein-like" abuse.

Francesco Rutelli, leader of the center-left opposition Margherita party, said he would abstain. His wife, journalist Barbara Palombelli, said her husband is mistaken.

"I am absolutely opposed to assisted fertility, but it should absolutely not be denied to those who choose it," said Palombelli, the mother of three adopted children.

Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, whose rightist Forza Italia party drafted the restrictive law, said his wife also opposes it. So does his party's most prominent female member, Equal Opportunities Minister Stefania Prestigiacomo.

Others in his party defended the law and the papal intervention.

"Who are we to say, `This embryo we like, this one we don't; this one we accept, this one we don't?'" asked Enrico La Loggia, regional affairs minister. "Who are we to make such an aberrant choice that not even during Nazism they would have dreamt to make?"

"The pope has the right to say his opinion," La Loggia said, "and he says it well."

Under the law, a woman is limited to artificially insemiating thre eggs, and all three must be implanted in the woman's womb. None can be frozen. That means that if pregnancy does not result, as is often the case, the woman must start over, again undergoing the harvesting of her eggs, which doctors say is the most painful and taxing part of the process.

Screening eggs banned

The law bans the screening of fertilized eggs for genetic defects, even for couples with a history of disease. In vitro fertilization is allowed only for heterosexual couples who are in what the law refers to as "stable" relationships. Single women, women beyond childbearing age and gay couples are not allowed to use the procedure.

Surrogate motherhood and the donation of sperm and eggs from third parties are also banned.

Mika Hayama got pregnant through in vitro fertilization last year, just before the law took effect and after trying for 10 years. The harvesting phase is difficult, she said, because it requires bombarding the body with hormones to stimulate ovulation, usually requires time off from work and sends the mind through a roller coaster of emotions.

"It is very heavy on the body, physically and psychologically," said Hayama, 38, who gave birth to a boy, Zeno.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.