Court to hear bias challenge against Md. death penalty

Lawyers using UM study that showed disparities

June 06, 2005|By Lisa Goldberg | Lisa Goldberg,SUN STAFF

Lawyers for a death row inmate are to present this week the first oral arguments before the state's high court using a state-sponsored study to try to show that Maryland's application of the death penalty is racially biased.

Wesley Eugene Baker's case is one of at least five in which the issue has been raised since the University of Maryland study by Professor Raymond Paternoster was released in January 2003 but is the first to earn a spot on the docket of the Court of Appeals.

Baker's attorney is expected to argue a central theme tomorrow: that his client, a black man convicted of killing a white woman in Baltimore County 14 years ago, was illegally sentenced to die under a system riddled with racial and geographic disparities. At the least, his attorney contends, Baker deserves a lower court hearing on the issue.

Nearly two decades after the U.S. Supreme Court knocked down a race-based death penalty challenge that relied on a statistical analysis, the mere granting of a hearing based on Paternoster's report is significant, said David Baldus, a University of Iowa law professor who has written several death penalty analyses, including one in Maryland in 2001.

Several states and organizations have commissioned similar studies, and Kentucky officials passed legislation in 1998 that allowed defendants to explore before trial whether race was a factor in the decision to seek the death penalty. But challenges based on statistical analyses are usually rebuffed before the courts ever reach the meat of the argument, Baldus said.

"People say, the Supreme Court says there's no problem, so therefore, there's no problem," Baldus said. "Getting to a hearing is a major enterprise."

Ripe for review

But the time is ripe for the country's highest court to revisit that decision, death penalty opponents say. The current justices have shown a willingness to reverse course on capital punishment, they say, noting a recent decision to end executions of defendants who were under 18 years old when they committed their crimes.

"I think a lot of issues have been given closer scrutiny, ... and race is ripe for that. It needs to be reviewed again," said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Washington-based Death Penalty Information Center.

But supporters of capital punishment say the 1987 Supreme Court ruling on the death penalty and race is still valid today. In the Georgia case, the court held that general statistics detailing racial disparities are not enough to show that decision-makers abused the system, which relies on their discretion, in individual cases.

Studies such as Paternoster's do not show that a defendant was singled out for capital prosecution because of race but instead illustrate that some communities are more likely than others to push for death, said Kent Scheidegger, the legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Sacramento, Calif.

The Maryland study found that Baltimore County homicides "dominate the state's capital punishment data."

"The people in more conservative communities elect tougher-on-crime district attorneys and they form tougher juries," Scheidegger said. "That's not discrimination. That's local government."

While three other death row inmates have been granted future Circuit Court hearings based on the Paternoster study, Baker's request was rebuffed by a Harford County judge last year, a decision that set up his appeal.

"This is a terribly important case, and not just for the inmates under sentence of death," said Baker's attorney, Gary W. Christopher. "It's really less about the death penalty than about the integrity we expect from our criminal processes."

The Paternoster report

There have been other studies that have looked, at least in part, at racial influences on Maryland's death penalty. But lawyers for death row inmates say the Paternoster report treads new ground, providing the most complete statistical look at how the death penalty was applied from 1978 to 1999 and accounting for outside influences that could affect the numbers.

The University of Maryland study looks not only at who was ultimately prosecuted for capital murder and sentenced to die but at what happens early on in the process, starting with a prosecutor's decision to seek the death penalty, said Julie S. Dietrich, one of several Washington lawyers representing death row inmate Vernon L. Evans Jr.

"This is the first thorough, comprehensive study that examines the influence of race and geography in Maryland's death penalty system, and [Paternoster] concluded there is a great impact," she said.

Evans, like Baker, raised the Paternoster report in a pleading and was denied a Circuit Court hearing. His appeal was originally scheduled to be heard with Baker's by the Court of Appeals but has been rescheduled.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.