Against apartheid, at odds with blacks

May 14, 2005|By Scott Calvert | Scott Calvert,SUN FOREIGN STAFF

JOHANNESBURG, South Africa - Helen Suzman still gets hate mail. These days it comes mainly from black South Africans, not white defenders of the racist apartheid regime against which she waged a determined and often lonely battle during 36 years in Parliament.

"You were just a spy of the Jews," begins the latest letter, an unsigned note that arrived this week alleging Jewish exploitation of the country's majority black population.

Suzman, who is sharp of mind and tongue at 87, tossed the letter on a table at her home north of Johannesburg and said such nastiness did not bother her. "I don't frighten easily," she said.

Suzman, once famous for her staunch opposition to apartheid, has emerged as a fierce critic of the ruling black-led African National Congress and President Thabo Mbeki. Her complaints range from "reverse racism" to the slow rollout of life-saving AIDS medicine. Mbeki has responded with barbed criticisms of his own.

There has always been tension between anti-apartheid whites and the black-led ANC, but the gulf has widened since former President Nelson Mandela - a close friend of Suzman's whom she first visited in prison 38 years ago - left office in 1999.

The rift goes beyond who did what during the long struggle against apartheid until its demise in the early 1990s. It cuts to the heart of a key question: Who has standing to help shape the future of a mostly black country of 45 million, whose 6 million whites retain a disproportionate share of economic power?

Though both the ANC and white liberals - a catchall label often used for white opponents of apartheid - campaigned for democracy, their political philosophies have diverged. The liberals favor a free-market, individualist approach; the ANC pushes for affirmative action programs so blacks gain control over "all the levers of power."

To some longtime analysts, Suzman and other whites who share her views have been too hard on a government still finding its way after decades of white oppression. Suzman, out of Parliament 16 years now, criticizes Mbeki and the government so "provocatively" in speeches and letters to the editor that it has marred her reputation, said Allister Sparks, a prominent journalist and author who sees himself as a white liberal.

Sparks agrees that Mbeki has major faults, including his unwavering support for President Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe. But he says the Democratic Alliance, the white-led opposition party to which Suzman belongs, has been "vicious" in its criticism of Mbeki.

"It depends on what weight you give to errors," said Sparks. "If you're going to denounce a party because it doesn't get everything right, that's tough. I don't know who you're going to support."

Sparks credits Suzman with helping to nudge white South Africans toward a negotiated settlement in the early 1990s and says it is a shame she is not getting that credit.

"It's terribly sad that she hasn't been able to move on in a more understanding way and receive the acclaim from the black community she really does deserve," he said. "It's in part her fault."

Others point a finger at the ANC and say Suzman remains a voice of reason. They say the ruling party is minimizing the contribution of whites to sideline them in political debates.

"One needs to see the attempt to airbrush white liberals out in the context of the present government's desire to create a particular version of history in which liberation was brought about solely by the ANC," said John Kane-Berman, chief executive of the South African Institute of Race Relations, a venerable anti-apartheid group. Suzman is a vice president.

"That tends to delegitimize the role that anybody else played and undermines the potential role they might play in the future," said Kane-Berman, who is white. "If the official version of events is that the liberals, white or otherwise, did nothing, their moral right to say anything critical of the present government and its policies is undermined."

The institute, founded in 1929, tried during apartheid to expose the white government's reliance on detentions without trial, a tactic used to silence and intimidate opponents. The ANC put such information to good use, Kane-Berman said, but it now resents the institute's focusing attention on unemployment, crime and the government's effort to control the judiciary.

"There is a deeply authoritarian streak in the ANC, and nothing demonstrates this better than their current, almost Soviet-type attempt at a history of the recent past," Tony Leon, leader of the Democratic Alliance, said in an e-mail. "George Orwell would have sized them up well: `He who controls the present controls the past ... he who controls the past controls the future.' "

Mbeki has obliquely fired back at Suzman and other critics. Earlier this year he used his weekly "Letter from the President" to suggest that liberals were disingenuous all along for having said they opposed apartheid while opposing armed struggle and economic sanctions against South Africa.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.