A Baltimore researcher shows that the longtime standard for body temperature is wrong. Cool.

February 11, 2005|By Michael Stroh | Michael Stroh,SUN STAFF

Behind every famous number lies a story. And in this season of sickness, when the thermometer frequently emerges from the bathroom cabinet, few numbers in medicine are as familiar as 98.6 - the normal temperature of the human body.

Celebrated in song and enshrined for more than a century in schoolbooks and medical texts, 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit is the benchmark many of us use to determine who goes to school or work and who stays in bed.

There's just one little problem: 98.6, it turns out, is a medical myth.

While it continues to circulate in publications ranging from this month's Parenting to the Bantam Medical Dictionary, studies in recent years have shown that 98.6 is not the normal human body temperature - and probably never was.

So how did this little scarlet line become sacred in the first place, and why has it fallen out of favor?

It's a tale that begins more than 150 years ago at a university hospital ward in Leipzig, Germany - and ends here in Baltimore, at the door of Dr. Philip Mackowiak.

Mackowiak, 59, is an infectious disease specialist and fever researcher at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center on North Greene Street. In the early 1990s, he became increasingly suspicious about the textbook value for the average oral body temperature, since it rarely reflected what he saw each day in his exam room.

"Every now and then, 98.6 would come up," he recalls. But only now and then. "It just didn't seem to make sense."

His suspicion eventually led him to conduct the first major examination of body temperature in more than a century. But he didn't stop there. An amateur medical historian who organizes an annual seminar to diagnose fatal diseases of the famous, Mackowiak decided to ferret out the number's obscure origins.

Despite its bedrock standing, "I had no idea where it came from," he says. And he suspected that most of his colleagues didn't, either.

Finding the answer would eventually require hours leafing through musty journals and century-old German medical tomes. He also wound up doing some unexpected historical sleuthing. For example, when Mackowiak heard about a 150-year-old thermometer suspected of playing a role in the 98.6 story, he gingerly toted it from Philadelphia to his Baltimore lab for testing.

In the end, Mackowiak discovered - perhaps not surprisingly - that the history of 98.6 is intimately intertwined with the thermometer's arrival in medicine itself.

Although the mercury thermometer was invented in 1714 by Gabriel Fahrenheit, it would take more than a century for physicians to apply it seriously to the measurement of body temperature and fever.

Volker Hess, a historian at Humboldt University in Berlin who has written one of the few books on the history of medical thermometry, says one problem was that early instruments were not exactly patient-friendly: A single measurement required a subject to lie quietly on his back for as long as 30 minutes.

Even then, the reading wasn't always trustworthy. According to historian John Haller Jr. of Southern Illinois University, it's not uncommon to find temperatures as high as 118 degrees Fahrenheit recorded on old patient charts. One early 19th-century physician reported treating a patient in a horse accident whose fever spiked to an incinerating 122 degrees.

But as instrument accuracy improved, so did the number of physicians investigating the link between temperature and disease. And it wasn't long before 98.6 made its appearance in medical literature.

As far as historians can tell, in 1835 French investigators Antoine Becquerel and Gilbert Breschet were the first to report that the mean, or average, temperature of a healthy adult was 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit. But, for whatever reason, their finding didn't generate much attention.

In fact, it took three more decades for 98.6 to take hold. The man generally credited with cementing its fate was a German physician, Carl Reinhold August Wunderlich.

In 1868, Wunderlich published Das Verhalten der Eigenwarme in Krankheiten. Translated three years later into English as On the Temperature in Diseases: A Manual of Medical Thermometry, it was immediately viewed as a landmark - "the first truly classical study of the thermometer in clinical practice," Haller writes.

In his book, Wunderlich reported that in 1851, he began recording the temperature of every patient who passed through his busy ward at the University of Leipzig. At first, Wunderlich ordered patient temperatures taken twice a day. Later, he increased it to four times, then six, "and in special cases even more frequently," he noted.

The result: Wunderlich's files ultimately held temperature profiles of more than 25,000 people - a pool of data so vast that even Wunderlich didn't know how many individual readings he had collected. He estimated several million.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.