Out at home?

Going to bat for limited spending, the D.C. Council connects, and baseball in Washington may be going, going ...

On the street, it's a split vote, too

Reaction

December 16, 2004|By David L. Greene | David L. Greene,SUN NATIONAL STAFF

WASHINGTON - On a side street in Southeast Washington, Louis Woodland was spending time with friends yesterday, wearing a cap that proclaims, "Negro Leagues: 1920-1960." The retired federal worker may love baseball, but he's no fan of the city's proposal to build a stadium in his part of the city.

Woodland, 58, said he is proud D.C. Council Chairman Linda W. Cropp was standing up to Major League Baseball by insisting private interests pick up half the tab for building a new ballpark for the former Montreal Expos. City officials estimate that building a 41,000-seat park and modernizing RFK Stadium as a temporary home for the team would cost from $440 million to more than $580 million.

"Right around here, you've got one hospital," Woodland said. "And you're going to spend $500 million on a damn baseball stadium? What if people get sick? They can't go to a baseball stadium. We need more hospitals here, with all the young people killing and shooting each other."

Meanwhile, Tom Flanagan, wearing a crisp new Washington Nationals cap and a Princeton sweat shirt, was dashing through a downtown subway station in a neighborhood that's home to federal agencies, law firms and lobbyists. The 48-year-old, who works for a lobbyist and caters part time, was infuriated by Cropp's late-night effort to derail a deal for bringing the team to Washington until more private funding is found.

"Linda Cropp is a fool," Flanagan said. "You have to spend money to make money. And this makes Washington look like a second-class, laughingstock city. Baseball should just be here. But if it can go wrong, it seems like in this town, it always does. Maybe there is too much money being spent on the stadium. But the proposed stadium site is near one of the largest open-air drug markets in the city, and that would be gone. And the stadium would create jobs."

The views from the two men underscore at least one way the question of how - and whether - to bring baseball back here more than three decades after the Washington Senators fled to Texas is dividing the city. In official Washington, many suit-clad residents envision a team buffing the city's image while luring investment dollars and jobs to downtrodden neighborhoods.

But near the Anacostia River, where the stadium would replace tawdry nightclubs, liquor stores, bus yards and a water pumping facility on a 21-acre tract, some people say that talk about baseball helping the inner city is hogwash and that taxpayers might be getting hosed.

Wrestling with future

Mostly, what emerged in scattered interviews here yesterday was a contemplative city, wrestling with baseball's potential benefits and pitfalls in the wake of the D.C. Council's 7-6 decision late Tuesday to require private interests to share the cost of building the stadium with the District. A Major League Baseball official yesterday called the council decision unacceptable.

The council undid an agreement that Mayor Anthony A. Williams signed with Major League Baseball in September. The agreement called for a new business tax to pay for stadium construction.

In general, people expressed support for bringing back baseball. But many applauded Cropp and her private financing amendment, saying she was fighting a worthy battle. Views were not always tidy, and many people would in the same breath say that they desperately want baseball - but public dollars would be better spent fixing dilapidated schools.

Of course, in a city rarely seen as sports-crazed, some people said simply they couldn't care less about baseball. And a few expressed ignorance of the effort to bring a team here.

Cropp found some support among young professionals and students, who said a new stadium might not affect their lives but it was wrong to throw millions of dollars behind a stadium when schools and neighborhoods are struggling.

"This is a moral thing, and we're doing the wrong thing here, because money should be going to education," said Anj Levy, an attorney braving the cold at lunchtime near DuPont Circle. She confided that she had another reason for opposing baseball here: "I'm an Orioles fan. And we should all just stay O's fans."

Lucius Peterson was downright undecided. The 60-year-old, who runs a small landscaping business, said he attended Senators games in the early 1960s. "I used to eat my little hot dogs and drink my Cokes," he said. "And I'd like it for baseball to be back here. It would be good for morale, and good for our youth."

Peterson, sipping coffee as he ran errands downtown, said evening baseball games would be relief for a stressed city. "Some people around here could go and relieve some of their anxiety. It could reduce some of the tension and frustration of this place. People could go and shout and fuss and have something to talk about the next day on the job."

`It ain't fair'

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.