IT'S BEEN nearly 10 years since Andrea Hamilton set out to write a social history of Baltimore's Bryn Mawr School. It's been six years since she sold publication rights to the prestigious Johns Hopkins University Press - and two years since Bryn Mawr, without explanation, tried to kill the book.
That makes Wednesday's official publication of Hamilton's A Vision for Girls: Gender, Education and the Bryn Mawr School well worth noting. As promised when Bryn Mawr yielded to news reports in The Sun and The Chronicle of Higher Education, and to a petition signed by more than 140 international scholars, there's a disclaimer at the beginning of the book: Bryn Mawr wants nothing to do with the opinions expressed therein.
But don't go out and buy this scholarly work - there are 26 pages of footnotes - if you want salacious gossip about Bryn Mawr or even a mild attack on Baltimore's 119-year-old college preparatory school for girls. If anything, this look at Bryn Mawr is affirming, particularly in its views of the modern North Baltimore institution. Hamilton's primary sin seems to be that she is an outsider writing dispassionately about some of the mistakes and missteps Bryn Mawr made along the way, among them how slowly the school (and all other Baltimore private schools) came to achieve racial and ethnic diversity in its faculty and student body.
