Mayor targets expense system

O'Malley vows to reform or end City Council's fund

$5,000 each largely unregulated

Options: to treat money as income, require receipts

March 30, 2004|By Tom Pelton and Doug Donovan | Tom Pelton and Doug Donovan,SUN STAFF

Mayor Martin O'Malley promised yesterday to eliminate or reform the City Council's largely unregulated $100,000-a-year expense account system, which allows members to keep for themselves any money they don't spend on city business.

"We are looking to update the expense practices and create a much more open and transparent way of dealing with City Council expenses," O'Malley said in an interview.

His comments followed a report in The Sun on Sunday that showed that Baltimore's system is unlike those used by other major cities and counties.

The handling of the accounts, which might be in violation of federal tax laws, is being scrutinized by federal prosecutors as part of a wide-ranging investigation into council members' finances.

O'Malley said his administration might stop handing council members advances totaling $5,000 a year apiece, and instead require them to file receipts before being reimbursed for legitimate business expenses by the city's finance department.

This is the kind of system used by legislators in many other jurisdictions, including Chicago, New York, Philadelphia, Boston and Baltimore, Howard, Anne Arundel and Montgomery counties.

A second option being studied is to allow the council members to keep receiving the $5,000 annually and report the money to the IRS as income, on top of their $48,000 annual salaries, O'Malley said.

This second option might require the council members to pass an ordinance officially granting themselves the raises, to $53,000 a year, said City Solicitor Thurman W. Zollicoffer Jr.

City Comptroller Joan M. Pratt, who has criticized the city's handling of the expense accounts, said the mayor's first option sounds more prudent.

"If a public official spends money, they should submit receipts before they get reimbursed," said Pratt, who added that the city should hand out cash advances only if the officials turn in receipts afterward.

Pratt also receives a similar $5,000 a year expense account and says she would be willing to abide by any rules the council has to follow.

The council's expense account system is at least 20 years old. In recent months, it attracted the attention of U.S. Attorney Thomas M. DiBiagio, whose office in September began an investigation into the council's financial and political affairs.

That probe appears to be entering a new phase, with about half of the council's 19 members scheduled to meet individually next month with Carl P. Jaworski, the investigator spearheading DiBiagio's probe, several council members said.

The council members said they were not subpoenaed to appear at the meetings. They said the discussions will focus on the voluminous documents they turned over in answer to DiBiagio's subpoena late last year seeking five years worth of council members' financial records.

President scheduled

Council President Sheila Dixon said yesterday that she was one of the members scheduled to meet with the investigators.

In addition, Dixon said she would meet as early as today with Finance Director Peggy J. Watson to "change" and "update" the council's expense account system "so that there are no questions in reference ... to how we handle it."

In Sunday's Sun, Dixon defended the expense account system, saying, "These perks are perks that everyone has gotten over the years."

However, yesterday, Dixon said of the process: "It does need to be updated."

The system might have evolved over the past three decades in part as an alternative to issuing council members city-owned vehicles, officials said yesterday.

But the city during the 1990s stopped offering cars to council members - except for the council president, who is issued a city-owned Jeep Grand Cherokee and a Crown Victoria - and allowed the council to keep the expense account money.

The system allows most mem- bers to take home $1,250 checks each quarter for business expenses such as travel, gifts and entertainment. The city does not require the council members to turn in receipts, or explain what they do with the money, according to city officials and documents.

This expense account money is in addition to the more than $80,000 that council members each receive from the city for running their offices.

The city does not report the $5,000 in expense account money to the Internal Revenue Service as income as long as the council members sign forms every year swearing that they spend the entire $5,000 on business.

Possible violation

This appears to be a violation of IRS tax laws, which requires all of such cash advances to be reported as income if employees do not give their employers receipts or detailed explanations of how they spend the money, according to IRS regulations and four accountants interviewed by The Sun.

If council members declare on these annual forms that they didn't spend the $5,000 on business, the city's system allows them to pocket the remainder.

In these cases, the city reports the leftover portion to the IRS as income.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.