'The Third Reich' -- solidarity prevails

March 14, 2004|By Scott McLemee | Scott McLemee,Newsday

The Coming of the Third Reich, by Richard J. Evans. Penguin Press. 622 pages. $34.95.

In cynical moments, it sometimes appears that the first law of commercial nonfiction book-publishing runs: "If you put Nazis in it, they will come." After more than half a century, the Third Reich retains its extraordinary hold on the public imagination. Its only rival, at least in America, is the Civil War. (One historian I know jokes that if he could find a way to get both into one book, he might be able to retire.) But there is an important difference in the way each serves to captivate readers.

The Civil War has the quality of tragedy, in an almost classical sense: a conflict of brothers (sometimes literally so) torn apart by differing conceptions of right and duty. By contrast, the power of the German catastrophe to command our attention is much more troubling. The Confederacy dehumanized people. So did the Third Reich, except it had the full force of technology behind it, rendering the whole process all the more depersonalized.

But what makes fascination with the Nazis especially problematic is the fact that they wanted to be fascinating. No mass movement has ever aestheticized itself so completely -- so ruthlessly. The Nazi leadership contained a disproportionate number of erstwhile bohemians and artists manques. They designed their movement to create awe and to defy reason. When readers consume books on the Third Reich, it is often a matter of yielding to precisely the dark aura that the Fuehrer sought to embody in uniforms, symbols, rituals, architecture and mythology.

The Coming of the Third Reich by Richard J. Evans, a professor of modern history at Cambridge, is only the first of what will be a three-volume history of the Nazi system. It draws on the enormous scholarly literature covering the regime, but it is not intended for specialists. It is a work of popular history -- but one with a difference.

Unlike other chroniclers of the Third Reich, Evans is not awed by the Nazis themselves. He defies their efforts to defy reason. He repeatedly asks, in different ways, whether the movement's rise to power was as irresistible as the Nazis tried to make it seem.

For all the charisma and sinister magic of Hitler's demagogy, he also had the skills of a modern politician capable of leading people to hear what they wanted to hear. As Evans writes, "The vagueness of the Nazi programme, its symbolic mixture of old and new, its eclectic, often inconsistent character, to a large extent allowed people to read into it what they wanted to and edit out anything they might have found disturbing."

While that evasiveness helped the party move from the political fringes to a growing presence in the legislature, it also meant that even Nazi cadres sometimes worked for the movement without actually reading Mein Kampf. "Among ordinary Party activists in the 1920s and early 1930s, the most important aspect of Nazi ideology was its emphasis on social solidarity -- the concept of the organic racial community of all Germans -- followed at some distance by extreme nationalism and the cult of Hitler. Anti-Semitism, by contrast, was of significance only for a minority, and for a good proportion of these it was only incidental."

Soon enough, of course, it would be far more central than that. The first volume of Evans' trilogy closes with Hitler in power -- and the Nazis working swiftly to transform themselves from one party in German politics to The Party, period, full stop. Countless books have told the story. But Evans has distinguished himself by offering an account that avoids the merely sensational, while bringing the real horror of it into view. How? By taking seriously a remark of Goebbels', who gloated: "It will always remain one of democracy's best jokes that it provided its deadly enemies with the means by which it was destroyed."

Scott McLemee, a senior writer for The Chronicle of Higher Education, has just received the Nona Balakian Citation for Excellence in Reviewing from the National Book Critics Circle. This review, in longer format, was first published in Newsday, a Tribune Publishing newspaper.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.