Letters To The Editor


January 27, 2004

Dog walkers helped reclaim neglected park

The editorial "Reaping what dogs sow" (Jan. 19) suggests that dog walkers at Robert E. Lee Park have shown a lack of respect for the park and their fellow citizens by not cleaning up after their pets. The Sun must not be aware of the recent history of the park.

For many years, Robert E. Lee Park was an unattractive and threatening place, a hang-out for teen-agers and other drinkers. I have been going there for more than 20 years and saw the dog walkers slowly reclaim the park.

They sponsored park clean-up days, held picnics, erected a small bulletin board with notices of pet immunization clinics and other matters of interest to pet owners, and put out containers for bags for people to clean up after their dogs.

A sense of community developed among the many people - old and young, black and white - who used this park regularly. People realized that we needed to care for this park, which had been ignored by a cash-strapped city.

But after several years, the Schmoke administration decided that this citizen self-help was not permitted. It took down the bulletin board, removed signs reminding people to clean up after their dogs and began removing the supply of cleanup bags almost as soon as they were put out.

Thus the city and those opposed to any dog park discouraged and hindered the very type of responsible activity The Sun now advocates.

If you truly believe in a healthy park, then encourage use of the park by those who have already demonstrated responsibility. Dog owners don't want to lose this unique place where they and their dogs can socialize and, given the chance, will take care of it.

This editorial is barking up the wrong tree.

Eric Waller


Reasons for cynicism about executive pay

Jay Hancock complains that the public is glad to see high-paid executives humbled ("Public disgust with executive enrichment is humbling," Jan. 21). But there have been far too many instances of executives running companies into the ground and then giving themselves bonuses, raises or golden parachutes. Just because such practices may be legal doesn't make them moral or ethical.

The resources of the company are not the personal property of the executives. Excessive compensation given to executives (often by themselves or by compliant boards of directors) is compensation denied to workers or stockholders, who are also entitled to a fair return on their labor or investment.

Many companies pay paltry or no dividends, squeeze workers for wages and benefits, and at the first sign of lagging profits lay off workers or send their jobs overseas. How often do we hear of corporate executives sharing the sacrifices?

When executives start sharing the profits and the pain, maybe the public will be less inclined to celebrate when a few of the greedy are humbled.

Craig Herud


Look for wrongdoing in schools' shortfall

Finally, an investigation by state schools Superintendent Nancy S. Grasmick into the $58 million mismanagement of school funds ("Answers sought in schools' deficit," Jan. 23).

But this is the fox investigating the henhouse. Where is The Sun's call for a criminal investigation? Or that of local TV investigative teams? Or of the state's attorney general? Or Mayor Martin O'Malley? Or the City Council?

As in many corruption scandals, a lot of people are afraid of being tainted when the truth comes out.

Hang 'em all.

Myles Hoenig Roland Moskal Baltimore

The writers are teachers at Southwestern High School.

Law shouldn't make killing any easier

In her letter "Scaring women away from right to choose?" (Jan. 18), the executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Maryland suggests that women, not politicians, should make the choice to have an abortion.

What this position fails to recognize is the fact that a human life is implicated.

Should the law be faulted for making it more difficult for someone to kill an innocent human being? Should bank robbery be legalized so it is safe for felons?

Benedict J. Frederick Jr.


Illogical to resist regulating abortion

I was appalled by the letter "Scaring women away from right to choose?" (Jan. 18).

It is illogical for abortion centers not to be regulated. Beauty salons have to be accountable for a healthy environment. So do dentists' offices.

Abortion is a major surgery. If abortion is safe, there should be no problem in opening up the records without disclosing patients' personal information.

Mara Herzberger


Cutting cost of care is the real solution

I read with interest about the Maryland State Medical Society (MedChi) ad campaign to raise awareness of the high cost of malpractice insurance ("GOP caucus a hot session topic," Jan. 20). MedChi wants a limit on pain-and-suffering awards and says some doctor's saw insurance premiums increase 28 percent in the past year.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.