State deficit tops Ehrlich's agenda

Strapped: The governor's business supporters will find him less focused on tax cuts and incentives and more so on slots and the deficit.

General Assembly

January 14, 2004|By Meredith Cohn | Meredith Cohn,SUN STAFF

In Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., the first Republican governor in Maryland since 1966, many business leaders believe they have one of their strongest allies in Annapolis. But as he begins his second General Assembly session today as governor, Ehrlich is pushing one of the leanest business agendas in years, observers say.

He has spent the bulk of his time advocating legalized slot machines to fill a budget deficit and finance education.

"The governor appears to have no legislative agenda other than slots this year," said Donald F. Norris, a public policy professor at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. "That's how it was last year, and nothing else got done."

Ehrlich's most recent predecessors, Democrats Parris N. Glendening and William Donald Schaefer, entered their second year as governors with much lengthier business agendas. Both eventually saw their relations sour with the business community to various degrees. But observers point out that two things have changed that both enable and require a different approach for Ehrlich: The state's so-called business climate has improved and the budget-strapped government has less money to consider cutting taxes or creating many new business incentives.

"Whatever he's doing, they like," Richard Clinch, director of economic research at the University of Baltimore, said of Ehrlich's relationship with the business community. "This governor has little latitude to propose big new ideas because he has no means for paying for them.

"Saying `no' to taxes, streamlining government and building transportation infrastructure are really the rallying cries of the business community," Clinch said. "To the extent there are no second-tier items on it, his platform is OK with the business community. He's addressing the fundamental issues."

Ehrlich doesn't face the dissatisfaction of the late 1980s and 1990s when business leaders felt the state was at a disadvantage in competing with Virginia, Pennsylvania and elsewhere because of taxes and licensing red tape, among other issues.

In the most recent survey of state business people conducted by the Maryland Business Research Partnership at the University of Baltimore during the third quarter of last year, the share of respondents who viewed Maryland's business climate favorably was the highest in eight years: 57 percent.

During Glendening's two terms, from 1995 to 2003, the positive business climate reviews were lower, ranging from the upper 30s to 51 percent, even during a technology-fed economic boom that provided millions of dollars for business issues, higher education and the environment. Glendening won funding to enable new football stadiums in Baltimore and outside Washington and passed a tax credit to fuel business employment.

Schaefer, elected in 1986, was considered a business visionary after leading the Inner Harbor renaissance as mayor of Baltimore. He had an aggressive economic agenda as governor that included funding for a new baseball stadium and light-rail transportation. By his second term, however, a national recession led to unpopular tax increases and eroded business support by the time he left the governor's mansion in 1995.

Today, business leaders say Ehrlich has no choice but to deal with the deficit first.

"When education has to be cut, I can't fight for economic development money," said Aris Melissaratos, secretary of the state Department of Business and Economic Development. "Business tends to pale in the face of all that."

He acknowledged that business incentives are more difficult to sell to lawmakers when 690,000 Maryland residents do not have health insurance and the state's ambitious plan for education is under-funded.

"There are very few major initiatives that don't have a cost," said Donald C. Fry, president of the Greater Baltimore Committee, a civic and business organization. "Obviously, we realize there needs to be some increase in revenue, and gaming seems to be the one most people are favoring over tax increases. But there doesn't seem to be consensus on implementing slots legislation."

While Ehrlich said increases in the state sales tax or other taxes are "off the table," House Speaker Michael E. Busch continues to support a sales tax increase over expanded gambling, putting the governor's priority in jeopardy.

The Maryland Chamber of Commerce supports budget cuts to cover a shortfall and says businesses are already weighed down by the rising costs of workers' compensation, unemployment insurance and medical malpractice liability.

"The top of our list is fiscal responsibility," said Kathleen T. Snyder, president and chief executive of the Maryland Chamber of Commerce. "We believe there still needs to be streamlining of government expenses as an alternative to increasing tax revenue, and we support carefully regulated slot machines in limited location to fund public education."

The chamber unsuccessfully advocated the same position last year, Snyder said.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.