Loophole threatened after liquor license ruling

But some see a chance to update Arundel law

November 27, 2003|By Ryan Davis | Ryan Davis,SUN STAFF

Outback Steakhouse would like to open another restaurant in Anne Arundel County, economic development officials say. So would T.G.I. Friday's.

But a county law limiting the number of liquor licenses per restaurant owner or corporation won't let them.

When the owners of Garry's Grill and Double T Diner faced the same problem, they found a way around the law - by slightly changing the name of their new restaurants and having different business partners hold the liquor licenses.

"There are nuances in the system that the locals know well that act as an impediment to the nationals," said Bill Badger, president and chief executive officer of the Anne Arundel Economic Development Corp.

Those laws, which some describe as a nod-and-wink system, may be in jeopardy after a recent court decision overturning a liquor license approval for a South County restaurateur. A judge found that Charles N. Bassford could not keep the license because he owned at least two other restaurants with liquor licenses. It didn't matter that the liquor license was in the name of a business partner, the judge said.

The Nov. 14 ruling threatens to close a loophole that local businesspeople exploited to open restaurants where chains could not.

"The impact of the judge's ruling is huge," Badger said. "For me, this is a wake-up call for us as a county. ... Isn't this the opportunity to say right now, `These laws desperately need to be updated.'"

Badger said he intends to push for a county law that would allow a restaurant owner or corporation to have at least three liquor licenses in Anne Arundel - where the population grew nearly 15 percent during the 1990s.

`Protectionist county'

While neighboring jurisdictions have opened their doors to more chain restaurants, Anne Arundel's law permits two licenses per restaurant owner or corporation. And the second license is only given for restaurants opened in areas that the county is targeting for new development.

"Anne Arundel County can no longer afford to be a backwater protectionist county, protecting special interests at the expense of expanded consumer choice," said Del. John R. Leopold, a Pasadena Republican.

Richard Bittner, chairman of the Anne Arundel Board of License Commissioners, said he is trying to determine the impact of the judge's decision, but he sees no need to clear the way for more national chain restaurants.

The liquor board's role includes counterbalancing the inherent advantages held by chain restaurants, he said. He pointed to the Applebee's, Chili's and other national chain restaurants that dot Bel Air and line U.S. Route 301 through Waldorf .

"I don't think in Anne Arundel we want to look like that," he said.

Anne Arundel's Prohibition-era law grew out of a state law that serves as a shield of sorts against the proliferation of chains. The way many interpret state law, it allows a restaurant owner or corporation to have one liquor license per jurisdiction, state officials say. Many localities, though, have won changes to allow more.

Although Carroll County still has a one liquor license limit, Howard allows up to two, Baltimore City permits three and Baltimore County allows up to four.

Clauses

Until 2000, the liquor license limit in Anne Arundel was one. But a combination of two clauses in the law allowed local establishments to open extra locations while keeping the chains at bay.

Based on the liquor board's interpretation, the first clause allows a proprietor to own multiple liquor-licensed restaurants as long as the license holder is different for each restaurant. (That license holder is also required to be a county property owner with a financial stake in the restaurant.)

The second clause prevents two restaurants of the same name from each having a liquor license, which effectively limits national chains unwilling to alter their name.

Here's how the locally based Double T found a way around the one-license law:

An assistant hostess who reported that she owns a single $100 share of stock in the parent company holds the liquor license for the Double T in Pasadena, records show.

The Annapolis Double T license is in the name of the kitchen manager, who reported ownership of a $500 interest in a separate parent company, records show.

As for the names, the restaurant in Pasadena goes by Double T II.

Representatives of Double T could not be reached for comment.

Bittner of the county liquor board said that if the market were there for chain restaurants to make money, they would be willing to modify their names and find separate liquor license holders.

But he agrees that county residents want more restaurants. He served on the committee that helped bring about change in 2000.

Law change

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.