President begins visit to Britain at a crucial juncture for Blair

Alliance on Iraq harming prime minister politically

November 18, 2003|By Todd Richissin | Todd Richissin,SUN FOREIGN STAFF

LONDON - Prime Minister Tony Blair stood before an audience yesterday to talk about schools and health care, but for the second time in five days he felt compelled first to address the visit by President Bush that begins today.

Blair, speaking to a business and community group in Birmingham, said that protesters were free to voice their opinion but that he had no regrets about inviting Bush to Britain.

"This is the right moment for us to stand firm with the United States in defeating terrorism wherever it is and delivering us safely from what I genuinely believe to be the security threat of the 21st century," he said. "Now is not the time to waver. Now is the time to see it through."

The prime minister's need to publicly justify his invitation has underscored not only how deeply unpopular Bush is in Britain but the considerable political damage the alliance has inflicted on Blair - and the further risk he is taking by connecting himself so closely to the president.

Blair was once the most popular prime minister in British history, but his approval ratings began to drop when he supported Bush during the buildup to the war in Iraq. They are the lowest they have been since he was swept into office six years ago.

"I don't think anybody can quite figure out why Blair invited him in the first place or why he could not somehow find a convenient diplomatic way out of carrying it through," said Peter North, president of Jesus College at the University of Oxford. "I cannot see how the president's visit can do anything but harm the prime minister."

Bush's visit has dominated the media here over the past week and shifted into high drive yesterday in Britain's national newspapers, most of which are overtly political and most of which strongly opposed the war.

"Chicken George," The Daily Mirror chided Bush in a front-page headline for his plans to bypass an address to Parliament, instead choosing an invitation-only forum for his only major speech here. The newspaper included an "Idiot's Guide to Great Britain," advising Bush that the sovereign is Queen Elizabeth II and helpfully adding, "That's pronounced `the second' and not `eleven.'" Above an article about the unprecedented security measures in London it published the headline, "Redneck Alert."

About the only newspaper to offer Bush positive words came from The Sun, a British tabloid that published an interview with the president in yesterday's editions. The Sun is far better known for its topless "Page Three Girls" and sensational celebrity interviews than for reporting on world events.

To some degree, the distaste for the Bush visit comes from the disruption in London, where streets are clogged with traffic on the most uneventful of days. Scotland Yard announced that huge swaths of London will be off-limits to protesters and everyday traffic alike, and it said the security force has been upgraded to include 14,000 police officers, up from 5,000 announced last week.

Inconsistently enough, given the country's deference to the royal family, Britons can be disdainful of world leaders who they believe are acting imperially. Blair has been pilloried for his use of an armored limousine with the pointed accusation that he was acting like the "president" of the United Kingdom. Even President Bill Clinton, wildly popular here, was criticized for the disruption his visit caused because of security concerns.

There are true bad feelings about Bush among many Britons, though, with nearly half of them saying he is not up to the job of being president and more than 60 percent disapproving of his performance in Iraq.

The failure to discover weapons of mass destruction is a bigger issue here than in the United States, and Britons are much more skeptical than Americans about allegations that Saddam Hussein was linked to international terrorism. Blair's contention before the war that the Iraqi leader could ready chemical weapons within 45 minutes has been the subject of an independent judicial investigation here, called the Hutton Inquiry, which is expected to issue its report in January.

"About the best thing that can be said for the timing of the visit is it comes before the Hutton Inquiry report," said David Leopold, professor of politics at Worcester College. "Blair has been trying everything to move the subject away from the problems in Iraq, and this visit only serves to remind people of the role the prime minister played in what has been the most unpopular war British troops have been involved with in my memory."

A major incident in Iraq during Bush's visit could hurt Blair, Leopold said, with the prospect of television news stations showing a split screen with Blair and Bush on one side while the other shows carnage in a war that the majority of Britons oppose.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.