Documents in probe gathered

White House says 2 weeks needed to turn over data sought in tracing leak

October 07, 2003|By Richard B. Schmitt and Maura Reynolds | Richard B. Schmitt and Maura Reynolds,LOS ANGELES TIMES

WASHINGTON - The White House said yesterday that it might take up to two weeks to turn over all the documents requested by the Justice Department in connection with its probe of who leaked the name of a CIA operative to columnist Robert Novak.

The drawn-out timetable, which suggests that officials might be considering invoking claims of executive privilege in connection with some of the materials being sought, comes as scores of White House staffers were scrambling to assemble electronic, phone and computer records related to the probe.

As of late yesterday, about 500 staffers had responded to a request from White House counsel Alberto Gonzales to turn over the requested records to his office by the end of business today or else certify in writing that they didn't have any pertinent materials in their possession, a spokeswoman said.

The hunt for documents began last week at the behest of Justice Department investigators checking out allegations that a Bush administration official leaked the name of CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson to journalists in an effort to retaliate against her husband, former envoy Joseph C. Wilson IV, for criticizing Bush's Iraq policy.

Novak disclosed Plame's name in a July 14 column, suggesting that she might have been responsible for getting her husband selected for a CIA-backed mission to Niger in 2002 to assess foreign intelligence that Saddam Hussein was trying to purchase a form of uranium to make nuclear weapons.

Wilson reported back that the claims about Hussein's interest in African "yellowcake" uranium appeared to be bogus, which has since been verified. But the allegation was still used in President Bush's State of the Union address in January, which in turn triggered Wilson to write an opinion piece in the New York Times critical of Bush's claim. Novak's column followed that opinion piece eight days later.

The completion of the document search will mark a new phase of the investigation, potentially putting the White House at odds with the demands of investigators.

Depending on the volume of materials, Bush lawyers face a potentially cumbersome task of sorting through information for relevance and then having to decide whether to assert a privilege for materials on grounds of national security or attorney-client privilege.

That has been a flash point in the past - from President Richard M. Nixon's initial refusal to turn over his tapes during the Watergate affair, to the resistance of some aides to President Bill Clinton to answer certain grand jury questions about the Monica Lewinsky case.

"They will read through everything that is provided and make an assessment whether there is anything in there that is potentially privileged," said Beth Nolan, a White House counsel during the Clinton administration and now a lawyer at Washington law firm Crowell & Moring.

"If something is just sensitive but not privileged, they cannot refuse to turn it over," she said, "but they may want to be prepared for that and know that."

A spokeswoman declined to comment on whether the White House planned to invoke executive privilege. But she reiterated that the administration planned to "cooperate fully" in the investigation.

The whodunit has, to a degree, gripped Washington and spawned speculation about who might have tipped off Novak and possibly other journalists.

Over the weekend, the White House, responding to questions from reporters, sought to eliminate two men whose possible involvement had been rumored: I. Lewis Libby, who is Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, and Elliott Abrams, director of Middle East affairs at the National Security Council.

"Neither of these individuals were involved in leaking this classified information, nor would they condone it," a White House spokeswoman said.

Previously, the White House had issued a similar denial on behalf of Karl Rove, the president's chief political adviser.

But White House officials have also attempted to draw a distinction between leaking the name of an operative, thereby breaking the law, and calling the attention of reporters to that information after it already was made public.

Meanwhile, a lawyer for the Wilson family said it is considering a civil lawsuit against unspecified government officials for damages.

The Los Angeles Times is a Tribune Publishing newspaper.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.