U.S. has stake in locating Iraqi weapons

Bush declaration puts burden on forces to find presumed arsenal

Deadline For Hussein

March 19, 2003|By Mark Matthews | Mark Matthews,SUN NATIONAL STAFF

WASHINGTON - Since President Bush has declared that the coming war will be fought to disarm Iraq, the United States has a major stake in unearthing concrete evidence of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction that has so far eluded United Nations weapons inspectors.

American assertions that Iraq possesses chemical and biological weapons could soon be confirmed, with potentially horrible consequences, if Saddam Hussein uses them by aircraft, missile or artillery against U.S. forces, neighboring countries or his own people in a desperate bid to save his regime.

Should an Iraqi attack employing chemical or biological weapons not materialize, however, the burden would fall to U.S. forces to find and expose to the world the deadly arsenal that Bush and others have long insisted Hussein possesses.

"If Iraq doesn't use chemical or biological weapons, and an investigation of the Iraqi program reveals just a small amount, we will clearly have egg on our face, and it could undermine the Bush administration's justification for going to war," said David Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security, a Washington research organization.

The quantity of chemical or biological agents that Iraq is found to have in its possession is important, Albright said, because "if it's below a certain size, they can't use it in warfare." Many countries possess small amounts, he said. "If the stockpiles are small, it undermines the argument that war has to take place."

Some commentators have made the opposite point: If American soldiers find strong evidence of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, many opponents of war at home and abroad will belatedly conclude that Bush was justified.

Even France, which has led U.N. opposition to military action, might reverse itself and fight alongside Americans if Iraq were to unleash biological or chemical weapons, the French ambassador to the United States, Jean-David Levitte, told CNN yesterday.

Hussein has repeatedly denied that he has weapons of mass destruction.

The Bush administration contends that Iraq poses a unique threat because, unlike other countries with chemical and biological weapons, it has used them not only against neighbors but against its own people.

A senior State Department official dismissed yesterday the possibility that Iraq might turn out not to have weapons of mass destruction after all and that Bush's reason for an invasion could therefore be called into question.

"We think we will find it. We know they have it, and dealing with a hypothetical is not something we spend a lot of time wringing our hands about," the official said.

The U.S. military takes the prospect that Iraq will use chemical or biological weapons in combat seriously enough that its troops are equipped with protective gear. Every Army unit has a specialist who trains soldiers on how to fight on a battlefield where such weapons might be used.

Citing intelligence reports, Pentagon officials said yesterday that that Hussein has given his field-level commanders the power to use chemical weapons without further orders from Baghdad.

During the invasion, troops and experts will launch a nationwide search to find and destroy any chemical and biological arms, an effort spearheaded by specialists from the Technical Escort Unit and the Chem-Bio Rapid Response Team, both based at the Aberdeen Proving Ground.

"The president sees that as a major part of the effort," the State Department official said. The presumption that Hussein has chemical and biological weapons and intends to develop nuclear arms lies at the heart of Bush's legal and political justification for going to war to topple the Iraqi dictator.

In his speech Monday night, the president justified a pre-emptive attack in part on three U.N. Security Council resolutions. The first, from November 1990, authorized nations to use "all necessary means" not only to expel Iraqi forces from Kuwait but to enforce "all subsequent relevant resolutions."

The second, adopted in April 1991, suspended the gulf war hostilities but required Iraq to disclose and dismantle its chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs and all missiles beyond a prescribed range. The third, adopted last November, declared that Iraq had not complied with numerous U.N. mandates after 12 years, and threatened "serious consequences," a diplomatic euphemism for war.

Bush also said in his speech that it could be suicidal if the United States failed to prevent Iraq from turning over weapons of mass destruction to terrorists.

But the administration hasn't been able to show to the satisfaction of many experts that Hussein has active ties to al-Qaida. Also, some intelligence officials say, he would be most likely to use chemical or biological weapons if confronted by a direct threat to his regime's survival.

Some American claims about Iraq's weapons programs have been called into question.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.