Bills seek slots money for host areas

Communities near tracks would receive 5 percent of revenue from machines

Sponsored by city lawmakers

Ehrlich willing to discuss concerns, spokesman says

February 23, 2003|By Reginald Fields | Reginald Fields,SUN STAFF

State lawmakers from Baltimore are demanding that a larger percentage of racetrack slot machine proceeds be returned to host communities, challenging the governor's gambling proposal.

Their bills add to the burgeoning debate over who should control and benefit from local impact money that would come from slots.

That debate is occurring not only in the legislature but in the neighborhoods nearest to Pimlico Race Course, where some residents fear their community won't get as much aid as those near other racetracks proposed as sites for slot machines.

Identical House and Senate bills sponsored by city lawmakers would require that 5 percent of slots proceeds be returned to neighborhoods within one mile of slots venues.

Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. has proposed allowing slots at four tracks - Pimlico, Laurel Park, Rosecroft and a track to be built in Allegany County - to increase state revenue and head off a projected budget shortfall of about $1.3 billion in the coming fiscal year. His proposal would return 3 percent of revenue to the racetracks' jurisdictions - meaning City Hall and county governments, not specifically to the communities near the racetracks.

The Baltimore legislators argue that the governor's proposal shortchanges the racetracks' surrounding neighborhoods by not taking into consideration how slots would affect them.

"The problem with all the legislation that we have currently on the table is that they don't recognize the very important value the community has for hosting these venues," said Sen. Lisa A. Gladden, a 41st District Democrat sponsoring the Senate bill. "This bill puts on the table that the community needs a voice, too."

An Ehrlich spokeswoman said the administration is aware of the bills and that the governor's proposal - including the payout to local areas and who controls that money - is still open to negotiation.

Paul Schurick, Ehrlich's communications director, said the governor would be willing to meet with residents of the neighborhood surrounding Pimlico to hear their concerns.

"I don't see why they would be different from any other community. If they have an interest, the governor should meet with them," he said. "It would be a matter of getting it scheduled."

The governor's proposal includes a breakdown of how the proceeds would be divided, with the largest amount going back to the state to fund education. The Baltimore lawmakers' bills do not include a payout plan beyond the local share.

Their concerns are shared by Baltimore Mayor Martin O'Malley, who argues that the governor's proposed share for local communities is paltry.

While Gladden's bill and its House counterpart would cover any slots venue, the legislators are attempting specifically to address the residential neighborhoods around Pimlico. With slots, that track could draw thousands of gamblers daily, increasing traffic and concerns about public safety.

Creating a board

The bills would require that a gambling benefits authority board be appointed to control spending of slot proceeds and allow the funds to be used only in an area within one mile of the track. Racetrack owners would have to seek board approval before starting any renovations to accommodate slots.

The 16-member board would consist of lawmakers, racetrack and slot machine industry officials, residents, area business owners and school officials. The governor would appoint all but two of the positions. The House and Senate leaders would each pick a legislator to serve.

Gladden already is scrambling to amend her bill because, as written, it seemingly precludes spending proceeds in more affluent communities north of Pimlico that are within a one-mile radius of the track.

The bills say the slots money is to be spent in "priority schools" and "priority zones."

To be a "priority school," 75 percent or more of the student body must qualify for free or reduced-price meals; there have been no objections to that provision.

However, a "priority zone" is an area in which the household income is less than 130 percent of the poverty level - roughly $24,000 - or a community designated an urban renewal area.

That would preclude communities such as Mount Washington, which has a median household income of $63,885, and Glen, just northwest of the track, with a $39,173 median, from receiving funds.

"I am fearful that these bills discriminate against the people who live north of Northern Parkway," said Larry Kloze, a Mount Washington resident.

"Our neighborhood is not opposed to helping people not as well off, but this bill obviously is just an attempt to help people who are less well off," Kloze said.

Gladden acknowledged that her bill is intended to offer more help to lower-income areas, such as the depressed Park Heights community south of the racetrack. But she said she didn't intend to exclude others.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.