System to track police conduct

Computer base to identify officers for counseling

Change `culture of department'

Union says plan inhibits officers, creates quotas

September 25, 2002|By Del Quentin Wilber | Del Quentin Wilber,SUN STAFF

Baltimore police officials are designing a powerful computer database that will monitor the performance of the city's 3,200 officers in areas such as arrests, car stops and citizens' complaints, and identify those who might be headed for trouble.

Although the system is in the early stages of development, it is drawing sharp criticism from police union officials, who worry it will inhibit officers and cause them to be less aggressive, or, in other cases, prompt them to aim for perceived quotas for arrests.

Police officials say the database will ultimately help officers by finding those who would benefit from counseling before they commit serious offenses that require strict discipline. Many of the 50 police officers who were fired or forced to resign in the last two years had histories of such complaints, officials said.

The computer system - along with an aggressive training regimen that has been implemented - will help "change the culture of the police department," said Sean R. Malone, chief of the agency's professional standards division.

"Once this system comes on board, it will enable commanders to [better] determine whether officers on the beat need more assistance or whether they are not performing in areas we need them to perform," said Malone, who is in charge of designing the system.

While monitoring complaints against officers is nothing new, officials say the enhanced system will be better integrated with other databases and be far more sophisticated.

For example, Malone said, the program will track officers' arrests, car stops, accidents, missed court dates, sick leave and citizen complaints, and will compare officers who are doing similar jobs. He declined to say how much the system would cost but said he was seeking grants to help finance its implementation.

The database would note when officers' performances fall outside the normal parameters. Even then, Malone said, the data will not be used to punish officers; it will just alert commanders when to start asking questions.

But in some of their strongest criticism of the current police administration, union officials said the system will slow the progress police have been making in reducing crime.

Gary McLhinney, president of the city's police union, says officers will be less aggressive because they'll be trying to avoid complaints, which would be more accessible to commanders in the new database.

McLhinney, who has discussed the proposed system with high-ranking police officials, also suggested that criminals could manipulate the proposed system. For instance, McLhinney said, drug dealers might start filing complaint after complaint against good police officers to remove them from their posts.

"It's going to cause highly aggressive police officers to not do their jobs," McLhinney said.

"I don't think a computer database is the right way to do this," McLhinney added. "We have supervisors. We have a structured command staff. It's the jobs of the sergeants, lieutenants and majors to supervise. If they are not doing their jobs, replace them. Do not use a time-consuming and expensive computer system that is just going to put numbers on paper."

Another potential danger, McLhinney said, is that officers will sense what the computer database considers an ideal performance and try to meet those statistics rather than use their best judgment.

"You're not going to want to get flagged by Big Brother," McLhinney said. "Eventually, you are going to know what numbers are not going to get you flagged."

Police Commissioner Edward T. Norris could not be reached for comment. Malone says that Norris is "100 percent" behind the creation of the system.

Similar databases have been established at dozens of metropolitan police departments across the country, though they vary greatly in scope. In the Baltimore area, police departments track complaints against officers, but those systems are not nearly as extensive or sophisticated as the one being proposed.

Those who have studied such monitoring systems say they work, when used correctly.

"Any organization's management should know what its employees are doing," said Samuel Walker, a professor of criminal justice at the University of Nebraska at Omaha and a co-author of a 2001 National Institute of Justice study of such systems. "Management needs some basic data on the performance of employees, and that is especially critical in the police area where officers have special powers."

The American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland said that it supports the computer monitoring system because it will help commanders keep better track of problem employees.

"It's a very important way to ensure that police officers are performing their jobs in an appropriate manner," said David Rocah, an ACLU lawyer who specializes in police issues.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.