Forecast for TV's sweeps resultsForecast for sweeps results

TV/RADIO COLUMN

Prognosis: As time winds down, we've got some good news and some not-so-good news for local stations.

TV/Radio Column

May 23, 2001|By David Folkenflik | David Folkenflik,SUN TELEVISION WRITER

Mark Twain once wrote that there were "lies, damn lies, and statistics." Hard to believe that the man died 19 years before the advent of television.

First, let's deal with ratings. The May "sweeps" period, of smothering importance to local stations and networks, is pulling to a close after tonight. The ratings estimates from Nielsen Media are unlikely to be affected much by the final nights. So, according to station officials - and those statistics - we can say:

WBAL is happy. Channel 11's late newscast at 11 p.m. has asserted its dominance over that time slot, considered the main event for local markets. The size of its audience for the late news has grown, while competitors have all lost viewers from the same time period last May. (Of course, which All-Pro linebacker was on trial in Atlanta a year ago, making news junkies of all of Baltimore?) The station keeps its hold on the 5 p.m. news. And key national offerings such as "Today," "Oprah" and "Jeopardy!" remain top programs.

WJZ is happy. Channel 13 has narrowly wrested back control of the 6 p.m. news slot from WBAL. In addition, compared with last May, WJZ's top-rated morning news shows have added viewers from 5 a.m. to 7 a.m. (Audience sizes are generally compared year to year because of seasonal differences.) Its noon news, astoundingly, draws more viewers than anyone's evening newscasts.

WMAR is happy. Channel 2's morning show, long a weak spot, appears to be battling back, winning a markedly greater number of viewers from 5 a.m. to 7 a.m.

WBFF is happy. Channel 45's bright and shiny new morning show, from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m., registers well above the ratings generated by the recycled sitcoms that used to air in that period. Meanwhile, sister station WNUV (Ch. 54) has found ratings luck with "Judge Mathis," which has climbed in the ratings almost high enough to dethrone "Regis & Kelly" on WBAL.

Now, a taste of reality:

WMAR, WBFF and WNUV often are fighting to win a relatively small portion of the audience. With only a few exceptions, the gulf appears to be widening between the haves and have-nots. WMAR's network, ABC, has failed to provide the kind of shows that keep viewers tuned in most days of the week, and its prime-time viewing levels are down significantly from a year ago. WBFF has seen real growth in its morning news ratings - but they still are quite small. Success will take a lot longer to gauge.

Viewing levels continue to ebb on all network affiliates. Except for WBAL, all the channels saw their ratings dip for the late news. Except for WJZ, all the stations experienced a drop in ratings during prime time. Some local TV executives have noted a relatively dry month. Blame cable, blame the Web, blame book groups - whatever the cause, people are turning to broadcast TV less than they did years ago.

Advertisers don't care solely about these ratings. They typically care more about key demographic groups, such as the people between 18 and 49. Those statistics don't arrive for another few weeks.

A report's shortcoming

A May 15 health report on WMAR contained just enough information to pique interest, but not enough to shed light.

Medical reporter Anna Marie Chwastiak briefly described how three players died in the past three years when their hearts stopped after a sharp blow to the sternum from a lacrosse ball.

Given Baltimore's interest in lacrosse, and WMAR's broadcast of local games, there might have been a germ of a story here. It wasn't developed enough, however. It was never stated whether the three players were from the city, the region or the nation. For the record: that's a national figure. According to U.S. Lacrosse, the game's Baltimore-based governing board, 270,000 Americans participate each year.

Of the 6 million kids who play baseball and softball, three or four die annually while participating in these sports, according to National SafeKids Campaign, a not-for-profit group. Millions more play basketball, soccer and football. It would be worth learning what sports are the deadliest, and whether mortality rates are indeed rising, as the anchor's introduction suggested.

We didn't learn any of this.

In an interview, Chwastiak says she checked medical and sports journals and interviewed doctors and other health professionals for her report, part of the "Discover Your Health" series that air Tuesday evenings and Wednesday mornings. But she said the limited time she had to prepare it and the shortness of the story precluded presenting additional views.

Researchers affiliated with U.S. Lacrosse are meeting with NCAA officials and lacrosse equipment designers later this spring to see if new gear or regulations are needed to protect players. They could have been useful to the story.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.