In the final days of the last campaign, Al Gore took to entering coffee shops and approaching Mr. or Mrs. America with the following (rather indelicate) question: "How much do you make per year?" The hapless citizen would mumble some figure, whereupon Mr. Gore would reply, "Well, you'd get a bigger tax cut under my plan than under my opponent's." Mr. Gore also alleged that he, rather than George W. Bush, would shrink the size of the federal bureaucracy.
That the Democratic nominee for president should campaign this way is testament to what some call "the conservative revolution." Few now deny that such a revolution has taken place. The only question is whether it is the central fact of recent U.S. political history. It is.
The conservative revolution began (more or less) in 1955 when William F. Buckley Jr. founded National Review. (I happen to work for this magazine, but, to give an honest account, must include it.) Mr. Buckley gathered around him a famously motley crew: classical liberals, right-wingers, Burkean conservatives, religious conservatives, atheistic libertarians. But they all had one thing in common: anti-communism, anti-collectivism, anti-(modern) liberalism. And they were prepared to do battle.
