Drug woes are no game

Improved testing, diligence used to pursue `cheaters'

`Scared a lot of them'

Record performances raise doubts, concerns

Summer Olympics

September 15, 2000|By Bill Glauber | Bill Glauber,SUN FOREIGN STAFF

SYDNEY, Australia - Who's cheating?

That is the troubling question facing the 2000 Summer Olympics today as more than 10,000 athletes from 200 countries are due to gather under a southern sky to rekindle a flame and pay homage to sporting glory.

Beneath the glitter of the opening ceremonies, the symbolic advance of Australia toward a new century and the stirring aspiration of an Olympic motto of swifter, higher, stronger, the Games have been shadowed by the specter of performance-enhancing drugs.

The pre-Games buildup wasn't about athletic greatness; it was about sport's "war on drugs," as the International Olympic Committee instituted a new test for erythropoietin (EPO), which increases oxygenation of the blood and is believed to be beneficial in endurance sports.

Critics say the "war" is a public relations battle and not a serious effort to rid the Games of performance-enhancing drugs.

"It is doping that has played a major role in the promotion of the Olympics," said Penn State epidemiologist Charles Yesalis, who has studied and written extensively on performance-enhancing drugs. "The doping creates bigger-than-life athletes who can create bigger-than-life feats."

But IOC insiders say they're doing their best to root out the cheats, with a new, get-tough testing policy that has already yielded results.

Last week, China withdrew 27 athletes, including seven rowers who recorded irregular blood tests.

An Uzbekistan wrestling coach was detained at Sydney airport after customs officials uncovered vials of suspected human growth hormone.

"We've caught a lot of them, and we've scared a lot of them," said Franklin Servan-Schreiber, the IOC's spokesman. "That's where we are. My rough estimate is that 50 athletes pulled out in the last two months."

For the Olympics, which derive their global cachet partly from their image of purity, doping presents a serious challenge. Why watch the Games if there are rumors and whispers about athletes being fueled by pharmacological cocktails? Why should hosts like Sydney and Australia spend the billions needed and the years of hard work necessary to stage Games, when, at their heart, there is a suspicion that all is not well in the world sporting community?

"The fans may argue that they disapprove of doping, but do they disapprove enough to turn off their television sets?" Yesalis said.

No one knows. Billions of people are expected to watch what are essentially upside-down Games, as the Olympics come Down Under, out of season. Even in the United States, where events will be viewed hours - and in some cases more than a half-day - after they are actually held, the Games are expected to be a big television draw.

Yet if the IOC can't get a handle on the doping issue, the Olympics could be stained, a state of affairs that could affect the Games' growth.

"Their credibility is on the line," said John Hoberman, an Olympic historian and professor of Germanic studies at the University of Texas. "If they can't find some positives from 10,000 athletes, then something is wrong. Of course, they'll positive-spin it and say deterence works."

Games officials anticipate some 3,000 drug tests will be given here -2,000 taking place in competition and approximately 1,000 out of competition. The tests are designed to detect a range of banned substances such as stimulants, narcotics, steroids and diuretics.

Among the out-of-competition tests, there will be several hundred for EPO. The tests consist of both urine and blood samples, but they have been criticized because they detect use only within a three-day period. The IOC rejected a blood test developed by Australia that proved drug use in the previous 25 days.

IOC medical director Patrick Schamasch has defended the EPO tests, telling reporters "the deterrent effect is very important. I prefer to scare an athlete."

Yet with all the focus on drugs, a McCarthyesque atmosphere seems to be taking root in international sports. Record-setting performances raise suspicions among competitors and media. It's as if the presumption of innocence has been lost, and athletes are presumed guilty until declared otherwise, by lab results.

"It's pretty much sad, but right now, if you perform well in any sport, they cut your head off," Dutch swimming sensation Inge de Bruijn told the Australian newspaper.

Australia's 17-year-old swimming superstar, Ian Thorpe, has fended off doping allegations and made it clear he is against those who would raid a medicine cabinet to claim a medal.

"Using drugs isn't cheating, it's stealing victory from someone who deserves it," he told the Athlete magazine.

Coaches are trying to get their athletes to concentrate on their races and not get caught up in the drug talk.

"It's out of my hands," said Australian swimming coach Don Talbot. "Everyone has this in their heads, hoping it will be clean, told it will be clean. As much has been done as can be done. I only have a lot of hope that something serious is being done about the question of drug taking."

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.