Corrections officers need protection from the state's...


September 05, 2000

Corrections officers need protection from the state's attorney

Correctional officers are professionals who put their lives on the line each day. They work in facilities where inmates outnumber officers and their daily working conditions are, at best, trying, at worst, life-threatening.

On a daily basis a correctional officer walks among inmates who may at any moment attack the officer with a homemade weapon, throw a "correctional cocktail" (a mixture of various bodily fluids and other disgusting substances) or become involved in a fight with an inmate in which bodily fluids can be exchanged.

The Maryland General Assembly recognized that these officers are deserving of something better when it passed legislation recognizing that throwing a "correctional cocktail" at an officer is a criminal act.

But not in Anne Arundel County, where State's Attorney Frank Weathersbee has declared anarchy in the prisons by refusing to take new felony cases from the Jessup prison ("Costs of jail trials in dispute," Aug. 18).

Anne Arundel County may need additional funds to handle its caseload and the state should recognize that through the normal budget process.

But Mr. Weathersbee's decision sets a bad precedent.

Correctional officers put up with enough abuse inside the prison walls; don't further abuse their humanity by ransoming their rights for money.

Hillary Galloway Davis


The writer is counsel to Maryland Classified Employees Association Inc.

Unlike guns, cars have a peaceful purpose

I read with amusement the recent letter comparing cars and handguns ("Licensing, registering cars doesn't prevent their misuse," Aug. 24). While the analogy may sound clever, it ignores the basic issue to make a rather simplistic point.

When comparing cars and handguns one must remember that one is designed for transportation, while the other is designed to murder people.

William Smith


Rural areas aren't equipped to host mega-churches

The Sun's recent articles about homeowners in rural areas all over the state resisting the construction of mega-churches in their communities have missed an important factor in this struggle ("Residents battle plan for church," Aug. 28).

Such churches buy rural land because it is less expensive than suburban or urban land, which is serviced by public water and sewer lines.

Rural land is less expensive because it does not enjoy such public services and is, therefore, not suitable for intense use.

Large religious congregations would likely encounter little opposition if they bought land in suburban or urban areas that are suitable for intense use, instead of hiring lawyers to force huge square pegs into small round holes.

Harold H. Burns Jr.


City can't afford to be so generous to its workers

It seems that Baltimore City municipal workers have a really good deal ("Baltimore tries to stem tide of worker abuses," Aug. 28).

In the real world, most companies have a "use it or lose it" policy on sick leave and vacation time. Why should the city pay for unused time from 10, 20 or 30 years ago?

With taxpayers fleeing the city by the hundreds every month, we cannot afford to continue to be so generous.

Mayor Martin O'Malley should make it clear to those responsible for negotiating contracts that it is a new era in Baltimore.



Why the city's murder rate is so high

The Sun's editorial on the Baltimore Police Department's Eastern District redeployment has taught me one of two things: either I have to do a better job of communicating what we are doing or The Sun's editorial writers have to do a better job of reading what is contained in the paper's own news pages ("Norris raises stakes with east-side strike," Aug. 23) .

Let me set the record straight.

We are moving more than 100 officers into the Eastern District to spearhead a highly synchronized effort against the city's worst murder problem. This effort is designed in accordance with the way we now fight crime -- deploying police resources and tactics to target problems as they arise.

In the Eastern District, we are directing our efforts at the heart of an entrenched narcotics industry that for many years has driven the second-worst big city murder rate in the nation and continues to do so today.

There have been more than 300 murders in Baltimore each year for the last decade. The last time there were fewer than 200 murders here was 1978. Why does this town have a chronic murder rate that is almost nine times the national average?

The answer is that the drug trade here was allowed to become what the federal government calls the worst in the nation.

Three separate but related factors, acting with insidious precision, have created this lethal problem.

First, political leaders who said drugs are a medical problem, not a criminal problem, made the criminal justice system believe it could look the other way.

Second, the police department itself was managed to be more concerned with the way it was perceived than with the reality of crime on the streets.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.