Huge surplus spurs political horse-trading

$1.87 trillion forecast

Clinton seeks deal on taxes, Medicare

June 27, 2000|By Jonathan Weisman | Jonathan Weisman,SUN NATIONAL STAFF

WASHINGTON - The federal budget surplus is projected to balloon to a staggering $1.87 trillion over the next decade, more than double the 10-year surplus projected by White House budget forecasters four months ago, President Clinton said yesterday.

A surge in tax revenues - powered by strong economic growth and improving worker productivity - immediately triggered the kind of Washington horse-trading that is sure to heat up as Election Day approaches and lawmakers scramble for accomplishments they can take to the voters.

Clinton made what he called "a very good faith offer" to accept spending $250 billion on a Republican plan to eliminate the disparity between the taxes paid by married couples and singles, but only if the Republican-controlled Congress approves his $250 billion plan to provide Medicare recipients a prescription drug benefit.

"This is a proposal for true compromise," Clinton said in the White House Rose Garden, beside a chart illustrating a plunging national debt. "It asks each party to accept some of the positions of the other party in the name of progress."

As the president was offering a half-trillion dollars of the surplus, he was scrambling to rope off most of the remaining dollars for debt reduction and pet spending programs.

The economic boom has generated surpluses in three major areas of federal spending. Clinton was talking yesterday of the general fund surplus, which comes from income taxes and similar broad-based levies. Separate payroll taxes fund Social Security and Medicare, and those programs also have surpluses.

Both parties agreed this year to dedicate all of the surplus from Social Security taxes - about $2.3 trillion over 10 years - to debt repayment. Yesterday, Clinton embraced a proposal by Vice President Al Gore to also earmark Medicare taxes for debt reduction, thus taking an additional $403 billion from the money available for spending or tax cuts.

Dedicating Medicare and Social Security surpluses to debt reduction would erase $2.7 trillion of the $3.5 trillion the government owes the public.

"In the environment of just three years ago, that would have been considered unimaginable fiscal restraint," said Robert Reischauer, president of the Urban Institute, who once headed the Congressional Budget Office.

Clinton also proposed walling off a $500 billion "reserve for America's future," which would pay for retirement savings accounts, small tax cuts, education, research, health care and environmental spending over the next decade.

Projections keep growing

No matter how fast the White House scrambles to find uses for the money, the surplus projections keep growing. This year, the surplus - including Social Security and Medicare - will hit $211 billion. By the end of the year, the Treasury Department will have reduced the federal debt by $324 billion since the federal government began running surpluses two years ago. And Clinton says the government is on track to eliminate the debt by 2012, a year earlier than was expected last winter, and still fund his priority programs.

"We have an enormous opportunity here to build the future of our dreams for our children," he said.

Economists of all political stripes agreed that the surplus projections appear to be plausible, at least economically. If anything, the White House budget office's estimates on economic growth and worker productivity might be too conservative. For the past three years, forecasters at the White House and in Congress have significantly underestimated surpluses.

"We know these projections are going to be wrong," said Alan Blinder, a Princeton University economist and adviser to Gore's Democratic presidential campaign. "But since they are not based on rosy scenarios, we have no reason to believe they'll be wrong on the high side. They just could be wrong on the low side."

Few analysts believe such surpluses will materialize. They think politicians will find it impossible to resist spending the money or returning it to the taxpayers.

Republicans did not immediately accept Clinton's offer on a marriage penalty tax cut and Medicare drug benefit. Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott said he looks forward to "working with the president to end the punitive penalty imposed on married couples ... and providing the elderly most in need with a Medicare prescription drug benefit."

"What I will not do," Lott added, "is engage in political horse-trading that gives short shrift to the long-range challenges we face as a nation."

Democrats were taken by surprise by Clinton's offer to swap marriage penalty relief for a generous prescription drug benefit.

"I'm not happy about it," said Rep. Benjamin L. Cardin, a Baltimore Democrat. "It's too expensive."

In the fall, when Congress struggles to finish the 2001 budget in time to campaign, lawmakers might be in more of a mood to compromise.

"Just because we can't agree on everything, we shouldn't let that stop us from agreeing on anything," White House Chief of Staff John Podesta said.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.