Accord near for use of money

Tobacco suit to fund smoking prevention, cancer research

April 09, 2000|By Thomas W. Waldron | Thomas W. Waldron,SUN STAFF

Skin cancer screenings for Eastern Shore watermen. Russian-language newspaper ads urging emigres to give up their cigarettes. And Internet wiring for public schools around the state.

These are some of the tangible benefits Marylanders could see when the state begins to spend its share of the national tobacco settlement -- an estimated $4 billion over 25 years.

Under a blueprint developed by Gov. Parris N. Glendening and nearing final approval in the General Assembly, the state will concentrate its spending on 20 programs scattered mostly across three main areas: education initiatives such as teacher pay raises, efforts to reduce smoking in Maryland, and a stepped-up fight against a variety of cancers, whether they are related to smoking or not.

Lawmakers also have allocated tens of millions of dollars to expand drug treatment and to help Southern Maryland tobacco farmers shift to new crops.

The debate over how to spend the tobacco proceeds is being played out in state capitals around the country -- with different outcomes. California may devote as much as $300 million in tobacco proceeds to settle a host of expected police brutality lawsuits in Los Angeles, while Virginia is devoting some of its money to road-building.

Some Maryland lawmakers worry that the state is spreading its share of the unprecedented windfall -- about $150 million in the next year -- across too many programs. But the governor and legislative leaders say they are generally pleased with the final shape of the spending plan.

"There will be probably 50 percent less children smoking" because of programs funded by the tobacco money, Glendening predicted last week.

House and Senate negotiators have agreed to legislation that lays out a blueprint for spending on the broad health goals of battling cancer and lowering smoking rates.

Legislators opted not to require the governor to spend particular amounts from the fund on specific projects. But they have drafted, in effect, a policy statement that supports Glendening's commitment to earmark about half of the state's expected share of the money -- $70 million a year for 10 years -- for anti-cancer and anti-smoking programs.

Allocating the other half of the funds will be left to Glendening and his successors, with the consent of the legislature.

Debates about disbursement

The legislation culminates more than a year of wrangling among lawmakers and the governor about the tobacco funds. Although Maryland is enjoying a billion-dollar budget surplus, the tobacco money sparked some of the most aggressive debate.

Many legislators saw a chance to secure a share of the fund for their favorite causes -- everything from acupuncture treatment to school-based nurses.

After weeks of sometimes contentious discussions, lawmakers opted to embrace the priorities established by the governor: programs to curb smoking and various cancers. Assembly leaders said a final vote on the measure will come tomorrow, the last day of the legislature's annual 90-day session.

The initiative to reduce Maryland's high cancer rates -- expected to cost $400 million over 10 years -- has raised the most doubts among legislators. The money will be spread across many different fronts around the state.

Local health departments, working with coalitions composed of community representatives, will receive $15 million a year for prevention and screening efforts. Dr. Georges C. Benjamin, the state health secretary, said such spending likely will lead to screening and prevention programs geared to groups with particularly high cancer rates.

On the Eastern Shore, local leaders might choose to spend the money checking watermen for skin cancer. In Baltimore, officials might focus on African-American men, who tend to have high rates of prostate cancer, Benjamin said.

He predicted that the new spending would foster creative outreach efforts -- focusing, perhaps, on a public housing complex and calling upon local residents for help.

"I'm no good at going into a housing project and getting those citizens to move on anything," Benjamin said. "You need people who are currently in those communities to bridge those gaps. That means the churches -- pulling together a meeting of some of the ministers."

Medical institutions benefit

The state's two most prominent medical institutions, Johns Hopkins Hospital and the University of Maryland Medical System's Greenebaum Cancer Center, secured commitments for $15 million a year for the next decade to expand their efforts to fight cancer.

Hopkins will use its share to add wings to two buildings and to increase salaries of researchers involved in an ambitious effort to track cancer rates around the state and identify environmental factors.

Hopkins officials are pleased with the state assistance, particularly with lawmakers' 10-year commitment to the effort -- which is much longer than typical federal research grants.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.