State university leads the way for high-tech industriesHow...


September 10, 1999

State university leads the way for high-tech industries

How refreshing it was to read The Sun's Aug. 31 report on Maryland's high-technology sector ("State trails in tech areas"). It was nice to see recognition that the state's "blue-chip research universities" are a principal asset.

That statement stood in sharp contrast to The Sun's earlier article quoting an economist's claim that the absence of major universities is the only factor separating Maryland from national high-tech leadership ("Maryland economy loses sizzle," Aug. 27). That statement caused a start here in College Park.

The University of Maryland, College Park is ranked in the nation's top 25 schools in business, engineering and computer science -- key disciplines for the high-tech economy -- by U.S. News & World Report.

Our sponsored research expenditures exceed $200 million a year and fully one-half of all National Science Foundation research funding coming into the state supports College Park programs.

We graduate more computer science majors than any college or university in the region. We are to information and communications technology what Johns Hopkins is to biomedicine.

Our research and development partnerships with major federal laboratories are very strong.

Our business incubator program has spun out 33 start-up technology companies since 1985 and our Technology Extension Service is to the state's technology industry what our Cooperative Extension Service is to its farmers.

Maryland can take great pride in the achievements of the state university.

We are pleased that the people who shape opinions in Maryland are recognizing the educational and technological treasure that exists here.

C. D. Mote Jr.

College Park

The writer is president of the University of Maryland, College Park.

Non-Christians seeking a candidate of their own

The Sun's article "Private faith helps guide public life" (Sept. 7) quotes city Councilman Martin O'Malley saying, "Being Catholic, I'm not used to a couple of things in church. One is good music . . . the other thing is politics."

That's cute, but Mr. O'Malley should wake up and smell the incense.

Abortion sometimes gets mentioned in Catholic churches. And the exclusively male priesthood takes positions on women's rights and sexual liberation.

School vouchers, particularly for church-operated schools, have recently been hot topics.

Are these not political issues?

The notion that churches do not have political agendas -- which they push with their tax-free dollars -- is disingenuous.

Confronted with two Jesuit-trained Roman Catholics and a Pentecostalist leading the race for the Democratic nomination for mayor, we non-Christians (atheists, humanists, Buddhists, Muslims) find ourselves between two rocks and a hard place.

Franklin T. Evans


Media haven't told people about all the candidates

It has long greatly irked me that the national media take it upon themselves to anoint two or three political parties and certain candidates as "major" or "viable," while ignoring all the others.

Now I must also take strong issue with the local media, including The Sun, for anointing three or four of Baltimore's mayoral candidates as major -- and ignoring or downplaying the others.

How am I to make an informed choice when I go in the voting booth unfamiliar with the plans of some of the candidates?

I am looking for a candidate who has enough influence with the governor and the General Assembly to get the state funding the city desperately needs.

Who can do that? And how would I know?

The Sun has failed miserably in its duty to keep its readers well-informed.

Harry E. Bennett Jr.


Let's keep the focus on candidates' positions

I was puzzled by The Sun's editorial "George W. Bush -- Did he or didn't he?" (Aug 25).

Didn't we recently hear over and over from the press that the public was tired of hearing about politicians' personal lives? That it was time to stop wasting taxpayers' money with these costly investigations?

Then why did this editorial conclude, "Still, it is time to get all the facts out in the open?" Is The Sun suggesting another full-scale investigation?

As a conscientious, taxpaying voter I would prefer that Texas Gov. George W. Bush and every other candidate present themselves on the basis of what they stand for today.

Shirley Smoot


Criticism of Gov. Bush is liberal hypocrisy

After six-plus years of lies and immorality from the White House, it amuses me that liberal Democrats are stirred up over the notion that Texas Gov. George W. Bush may have snorted some coke when he was young. What hypocrites.

Who better to punish drug offenders and discourage the use of life-sucking drugs than someone who has experienced their destructive potential?

And that's assuming Mr. Bush did use cocaine.

Let's get some technicalities straight: Mr. Bush does not create the laws of Texas, he merely enforces them. The state legislature, composed of Democrats as well as Republicans, passes the laws.

Douglas B. Hermann


Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.