Shooting highlights treatment questions

Maryland studies ways to forestall violence by the mentally ill

February 07, 1999|By Scott Shane and Jonathan Bor | Scott Shane and Jonathan Bor,SUN STAFF

In the wake of several highly publicized crimes committed by the mentally ill, Maryland officials are studying ways to force patients outside the hospital to take medication that can prevent psychotic episodes.

A mental health task force is considering whether the state should permit courts to order patients to stay in treatment or face involuntary hospitalization. Similar measures have been adopted by 39 other states, often in the face of opposition from patients' rights advocates.

But the case of Richard K. Geier, the 23-year-old man accused of chasing and shooting a lawyer on a busy downtown street Tuesday morning, illustrates the difficulty of designing laws that will prevent violent acts by the mentally ill.

Bizarre and menacing talk is a common feature of schizophrenia, but few patients carry out their threats. Doctors say it can be difficult to predict which patients will turn violent.

Bill and Pat Geier feared their son might harm someone but found there was little they could do about it. They say the system should be changed to make it easier to treat patients whose very symptoms make them fear doctors and medication.

"If they're sick and are documented to be so, there has to be a way to keep them on medication," saidBill Geier, 60, who runs a woodcraft business with his wife from their Parkville home. "With someone over 21, the family is secondary to the patient's rights, and I think that's probably appropriate. But all we wanted to do was to get Richard the help he needed."

Last year, after a schizophrenic man fatally shot two policemen at the U.S. Capitol, the state Mental Hygiene Administration assembled a panel to consider the problem of noncompliant patients. In January, a disturbed man pushed a woman into the path of a subway train in New York, killing her.

The Maryland panel is considering whether to propose a system of "outpatient commitment" in which courts could order outpatients to take their medication. Patients who refuse could be picked up by police, evaluated at an emergency room and admitted to the hospital against their will.

"The Capitol shooting got people talking," said E. Lawrence Fitch Jr., a lawyer for the Mental Hygiene Administration and the panel's co-chairman. "People are concerned when these things happen, but at the same time the public doesn't recognize that thousands of people are in treatment all the time and these cases, when they happen, are pretty aberrant."

Each year, of more than 18,000 homicides committed across the country, mental health experts say about 1,000 are committed by the mentally ill.

The panel might propose a pilot program to test the effectiveness of outpatient commitment among a few hundred patients, Fitch said. They would be compared to others who would be offered the same intensive outpatient care -- but without the legal threat.

"The hope is that, just by the very fact that there is this legal scrutiny, they will comply with treatment," said Dr. Steven S. Sharfstein, head of the Sheppard Pratt Health System and a panel member. "But it's very difficult to force people if they don't want to take medication."

Among the 39 states with outpatient commitment laws, the record has been spotty. Many didn't provide the tools to enforce the law, such as caseworkers to track patients and visit them when they failed to show up for treatments. A pilot program in New York found lower rates of violent behavior and repeat hospitalizations among patients who were offered intensive outpatient care -- whether or not they were under court orders.

Mary Zdanonicz, director of the Treatment Advocacy Center in Arlington, Va., said the threat of a court order can persuade a disturbed patient to stay in treatment.

"Sometimes, the real specter of returning to the hospital is enough to convince someone to take medication," she said. "It also empowers the mental health workers to become more effective in working with clients."

Patients' support groups, however, have often opposed any effort to force treatment.

"There is definitely a question of individual rights: How do you put mechanisms in place to ensure that the system doesn't go out trying to commit anybody who doesn't show up for a clinical appointment?" said Mike Finkle, a panel member who is the director of On Our Own of Maryland, a patient advocacy group in Baltimore.

It is not clear that an outpatient commitment law would have affected a patient like Geier, who did not have a long history of psychiatric care.

In most states, said Sharfstein, "to meet the criteria you have to show you repeatedly failed to cooperate. There would have had to be three, four, five hospitalizations."

Like most people with schizophrenia, Richard Geier developed symptoms in early adulthood.

After graduating from Parkville High School in 1993, Geier worked in a series of low-skill jobs. He bused tables at the Parkville American Legion, hauled carpets for an Oriental rug company, worked construction and washed silk screens for a T-shirt maker.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.