Likelihood of live testimony dwindles

Interrogation of Blumenthal yields little new evidence

February 04, 1999|By Karen Hosler and Jonathan Weisman | Karen Hosler and Jonathan Weisman,SUN NATIONAL STAFF

WASHINGTON -- As pressure builds to end President Clinton's impeachment trial, the House Republican prosecutors are facing long odds in their quest to win Senate approval for live witnesses who could prolong the unpopular trial.

With votes on the witness issue to begin today, Republican support seems to be shifting toward allowing prosecutors to use only excerpts of the videotaped depositions of Monica Lewinsky and the two other witnesses -- and perhaps only in closing arguments.

"I doubt seriously that there'll be the votes to have any live witnesses in this matter," Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, a Utah Republican, predicted in an interview on NBC's "Today."

"I've always been in favor of live witnesses. I think you let the American people be the judge. And the only way they can is to see these people in person."

The prosecutors' request for live testimony was not helped yesterday when the deposition of their third and final witness, Sidney Blumenthal, a senior White House aide, failed to produce any major new evidence.

The prosecutors assert that Clinton told Blumenthal a false account of his relationship with Lewinsky, knowing that Blumenthal would be summoned before Kenneth W. Starr's grand jury and would repeat that lie.

Though they had up to four hours to question Blumenthal, the prosecutors took only about 70 minutes.

As with Lewinsky's deposition Monday, White House lawyers asked no questions of Blumenthal, signaling that they felt the prosecutors' queries had done nothing to advance the case for Clinton's conviction and removal from office.

In the meantime, Senate Republicans debated yesterday whether to seek a vote on a "finding of fact" that Clinton committed wrongdoing, even though the president is likely to be acquitted on the actual articles of impeachment.

Democrats are unanimously opposed to such a finding, which some call unconstitutional, and Republican sentiment is mixed.

Votes today and perhaps tomorrow on how to handle witness testimony may represent the last great hurdle for the prosecutors before the end of what has become a nearly impossible case for them to win.

With a two-thirds majority needed to convict Clinton and remove him from office, the prosecutors have been counting on some revelation or emotional impact from witnesses, particularly Lewinsky, to change the dynamic in their favor.

Live testimony from the Senate floor has long been a top goal of the prosecutors, and they vowed to continue the fight.

"If they're going to have a verdict that will withstand the test of history, these witnesses should come forward, and they should be put under oath live on the Senate floor," said Rep. James E. Rogan, a California Republican who led the questioning of Blumenthal.

But with polls showing a sizable majority of Americans critical of the Republicans' handling of the trial and eager for it to end, Republican senators are losing their enthusiasm for calling witnesses to help chronicle a presidential affair and cover-up.

"From what I've seen of the depositions, I don't think we need live witnesses," said Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas, one of at least a half-dozen Republicans who have expressed such doubts. "I think the videotape excerpts will serve that purpose."

Among other Republicans who have voiced skepticism about the need for live witnesses are Olympia J. Snowe of Maine, Richard C. Shelby of Alabama, John W. Warner of Virginia and Ted Stevens of Alaska. James M. Jeffords of Vermont is also leaning against voting for witnesses, an aide said.

The defection of a handful of the 55 Republicans could doom live testimony because most -- and perhaps all -- of the 45 Democrats are also expected to vote against it.

Rep. Henry J. Hyde, leader of the prosecutors, said last night that his team would also seek permission today to use excerpts from the three depositions -- of Lewinsky, Blumenthal and Vernon Jordan, a Clinton confidant -- in a presentation that would require a day or so.

Hatch, Brownback and other senators say they envision a briefer process, perhaps allowing the prosecutors and White House attorneys to use the deposition videotapes in closing arguments, which could begin Saturday.

But Hyde complained that if the videotapes were used that way, "the flow of rhetoric gets interrupted."

Democrats might fight any limited use of the videotapes, demanding that depositions be publicly released in their entirety or not at all.

"My inclination is that it's all or nothing," said Tom Daschle of South Dakota, the Senate Democratic leader.

In his deposition yesterday, sources said, Blumenthal conceded that Clinton never pulled him aside to correct the original story that the president had told him about Lewinsky just after the sex scandal became public.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.