Ex-police chief right to answer Owens' charges
I was happy to see that the former Anne Arundel County Police Chief Larry Tolliver has decided to speak out in regard to accusations made by the Anne Arundel County Executive Janet S. Owens. For those of us who know and respect Mr. Tolliver as an effective and efficient police professional, it is impossible to believe that he misused his office for political purposes.
As a resident of Anne Arundel County and having known Mr. Tolliver for several years and trusting his ability to lead the county police, it was distressing to see his professional and personal integrity questioned by our new executive.
Unless Ms. Owens has the evidence to back up her statements that Mr. Tolliver subverted the law and misused his office, Mr. Tolliver has every right to expect an apology.
Ms. Owens needs to set the record straight. I recognize and support her right to select her own chief, but not to make accusations that she cannot or refuses to back up. The comments in your recent article by John Kurpjuweit, a member of the board of the Teachers Association of Anne Arundel County, that "this all boils down to sour grapes," and "I'm sure that Tolliver would not have been doing any protesting had his friend John Gary won the election," adds insult to injury. Mr. Tolliver is "protesting" the unsubstantiated reason given by Ms. Owens for his termination, not the fact that he was terminated or that Mr. Gary lost.
It is time for Ms. Owens to offer evidence to support her accusations or apologize.
James E. Harvey
Funding is not behind county school woes
On Dec. 9, 1998, under the headline, "Schools post MSPAP gains," The Sun presented cost and student performance comparisons for schools in Anne Arundel and nearby counties.
Anne Arundel County's per-student expenditure essentially equaled Howard County's and was $450 (or 7 percent) more than Harford County's. Nonetheless, student performances were not comparable: Nearly 12 percent more Howard County students and 10 percent more Harford County students than Anne Arundel students achieved satisfactory MSPAP scores.
Based on The Sun's report, the performance contrasts cannot be attributed to funding differences. Nevertheless, Anne Arundel's superintendent of schools was quoted saying, "I'm disheartened because of the limited resources that have been imposed on us."
The failure, I would suggest, is attributable almost entirely to a disheartening lack of firm academic/teaching leadership and a focus on academic/teaching standards or quality by the superintendent and school board. Until those deficiencies are remedied, there can be no significant improvement in student performance. Until those deficiencies are corrected, providing the system additional funds will be ill-advised and wasteful of taxpayer dollars.
Frederick C. Guill
Mids savoring steak at taxpayers' expense?
I find it appalling that the U.S. Naval Academy has delegated the chefs such autonomy to serve a meal of steak/lobster at a cost of $100,000, according to an article in The Sun. With defense spending tight and many programs in the Navy on closely watched budgets, how can the academy spend so much?
I would like the opportunity to send my college student to have a steak/lobster dinner for only $5.25 (midshipman's daily meal allowance). Maybe my wife and I could come by. We'd gladly pay $5.25 per person. How can anyone justify this at taxpayer expense?
Parents can fix their kids' lunch
The free-for-all "meal plan" for schools is about the most stupid proposal I've heard.
It is unbelievable that a 6- to 18-year-old student hasn't got the knowledge or talent to prepare a couple of bagels with cream cheese, a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, a couple sticky buns, Pop Tarts, fruit along with a container of fresh orange, apple or grapefruit juice. It takes all of three ot four minutes and can even be prepared the previous night.
Low-income household students are the ones who need help, not two-income, $200,000 homeowners with two new cars and not enough time to prepare their child a take-to-school snack.
Wake up, people. Start being parents. Let the teachers get back to teaching.
Norman L. Atkinson
Like neighborhood before you buy there
I read Michael Olesker's column about the family who built their home on Oella Avenue and are now complaining about the smell of goats coming from their neighbor's yard.
I find it hard to believe that the Holdens, while buying their property and then building a home on it, never noticed their neighbor's property or goats.
These people seem to be in the same group as those who buy homes in Western Maryland and then want to get rid of the bears. Or the people around Frederick who want destroyed all the vultures that have been there for at least 100 years. Or people who build houses in areas populated with deer, and then want them destroyed because the deer are eating their shrubbery. The list goes on.