Toppling Hussein poses no easy task

Splintered opposition, widespread mistrust complicate U.S. goal

Bold words, little action

January 13, 1999|By Mark Matthews and Tom Bowman | Mark Matthews and Tom Bowman,SUN NATIONAL STAFF

WASHINGTON -- Two months after President Clinton pledged greater support for efforts to topple Saddam Hussein, U.S. officials have failed to persuade the disparate and divided Iraqi opposition to hold a meeting, let alone organize a revolt.

"There's no strategy" among the Iraqi opposition groups, said a frustrated State Department official, one of several who have held a series of meetings with them in recent weeks. "There's no political strategy, no military strategy, no philosophical strategy, no press strategy."

But American supporters and congressional staff members say the Clinton administration has dragged its feet on guaranteeing protection to the Iraqi opposition, leaving its leaders uncertain about the U.S. commitment. And several countries in the region are waiting to see whether the Clinton administration is serious about its calls for a new government in Iraq.

The drive to oust the Iraqi leadership has assumed heightened importance as the United States' effort at "containment" of the Baghdad regime runs into obstacles on two fronts:

United Nations weapons inspectors are barred from Iraq. Even if they eventually return, the inspectors are unlikely to resume their intrusive search for the hidden secrets of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.

Opposition is building to the tight U.N. economic sanctions imposed on Iraq after it invaded Kuwait in 1990. The United States and Britain are increasingly isolated in their determination to maintain the sanctions.

Even so, U.S. officials are encouraged by Hussein's increasing isolation from Arab leaders, as reflected in his recent vitriolic speeches.

In the wake of the four-day U.S.-British bombing campaign in December, there are signs of Hussein's nervousness at home, including his replacement of military leaders and reported executions of opponents.

Deepened U.S. engagement

In October, Congress passed the Iraq Liberation Act, which authorizes $97 million in aid to the opposition in the form of military equipment, education and training. A month before the attacks, Clinton signaled a new enthusiasm for congressional efforts to oust the Iraqi leadership.

"Over the past year, we have deepened our engagement with the forces of change in Iraq," Clinton said, "reconciling the two large Kurdish opposition groups, beginning broadcasts of a Radio Free Iraq through the country.

"We will intensify that effort, working with Congress to implement the Iraq Liberation Act, strengthening our political support to do what we can to make the opposition a more effective voice for the aspirations of the Iraqi people."

Clinton made that promise Nov. 15 as he announced that he was holding off on military action against Baghdad after an Iraqi pledge of cooperation with the United Nations. That cooperation lasted only a few weeks. On Dec. 16, Clinton ordered airstrikes.

With the president's backing, the State Department's Middle East point man, Martin Indyk, and other officials have met in London and Washington with Iraqi opposition figures. By the end of this month, the Clinton administration is to determine which Iraqi opposition group -- or groups -- should receive the $97 million approved by Congress under the Iraq Liberation Act.

Disappointing results

Most prominent among the leaders is Ahmad Chalabi, who heads a London-based umbrella organization of opposition groups, the Iraqi National Congress, and has won support among Republicans on Capitol Hill. The administration plans to designate the organization as eligible for a share of the federal aid.

A State Department official says the results of the Iraqi opposition meetings have been disappointing. Rather than impose a strategy, the Clinton administration has tried to persuade the groups to develop one. But the opposition groups have been weakened by distrust and ethnic divisions.

The idea is to have a meeting in London of the 22-member executive council of the Iraqi National Congress, followed by a meeting of the congress' 400-strong General Assembly in Washington. The United States would pick up the tab.

"We're disappointed [Chalabi has] not called it," the State Department official said. "The reasons are completely unclear."

"Why would we call a meeting? Who's promised us anything?" said Francis Brooke, a Washington-based adviser to the INC. "These people got killed before. Where is the [U.S.] commitment?" He strongly disputed any assertion of a lack of a strategy.

Kathryn Porter, president of the Human Rights Alliance, who has worked closely with Iraqi Kurds, says Chalabi wants to line up support among members of the Iraqi National Congress before calling the meeting but has been unable to do so.

`A level of mistrust'

One group that has been particularly reluctant is the Kurdish leadership, which sees itself as a key target of Hussein's. The Kurds suffered attacks by Hussein's forces in 1996, and the United States failed to help.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.