IS IT time yet for a history of slavery in Maryland? Perhaps not; for almost eight generations, slavery was lawful in Maryland; it has been against the law for less than five generations. Someone setting out to write the first general-reader account of what life was like for African Americans during slavery could find it hard to keep his or her own emotions out of it.
Meanwhile, objective retrospect of this state's activity on other fronts has proceeded -- books having to do with agriculture, banking, the courts and so on. These enterprises still go on, but no living Marylander had a role in slavery. Ignore it long enough and perhaps slavery, like the early white settlers' expulsion of the Indians, will fade into oblivion.
Many people nowadays are unconcerned with time gone by; others avoid unpleasantness. Sometimes the victims of slavery are passed off as the simple-minded wards of benevolent protectors in the pre-Civil War land of cotton and magnolias -- far away. The decennial censuses say otherwise. In 1790, Maryland's slaves numbered 103,376 (in a population of 319,728); by 1860, the total had dropped to 87,189 in a population of 687,049.) As the historian Robert J. Brugger points out in "Maryland: A Middle Temperament," by the 1850s, elements in the counties were busily out to reinforce the role of slavery.
