Sanctimonious heads of House and Senate should back off 0...

Letters to the Editor

June 28, 1998

Sanctimonious heads of House and Senate should back off 0) gays

Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott has joined House Majority Leader Dick Armey in whipping out the Holy Bible and thumping it to tell us how sinful homosexuals are ("Lott's pronouncement on homosexuality won't help the GOP," June 16).

I'm not surprised that these two sanctimonious hypocrites don't understand the establishment clause in the First Amendment of our Constitution.

I would not be surprised if Mr. Lott and Mr. Armey introduced a bill to eliminate all taxes and replace them with tithes.

Sexual preference is not sinful, ungodly or anything else. Neither is religious preference. Consenting adults have the right to have sex however and with whomever they wish. An adult has the right to worship a bowling ball, a goldfish or not worship at all. Every woman has the right to choose abortion.

If Mr. Lott and Mr. Armey do not wish to sleep together, fine. If they don't wish to bow and face Mecca, fine. And if they don't like abortions, they don't have to get one.

Gerald Ben Shargel

Reisterstown

Discrimination against gays is another form of bigotry

In your story about the fight against confirming James C. Hormel as ambassador to Luxembourg because he is gay, one quote stood out ("Envoy's nomination fires debate over 'gay agenda' " June 23).

Steve Schwalm, senior analyst at the conservative Family Research Council, said, "Anti-Christian mockery is the last accepted form of bigotry in this country."

That's a rather ironic statement to make when arguing (discriminating) against a candidate receiving a position he is qualified for solely because of his sexual orientation. Seems like anti-gay bigotry is alive and well in Congress.

Brian Cox

Baltimore

Protecting moral standards but killing us with pollution

After reading the last in a long line of articles concerning Gov. Parris N. Glendening's tired no-slots stand and his shallow arguments and commentary on values, I would like to pose a couple of questions.

Does the governor consider industries that pollute our waters, store hazardous waste materials and seek relief from air quality emissions standards to be the wholesome kind of businesses we want in Maryland?

These hard production industries the governor values so much cost every Marylander, without their freedom of choice, extra dollars in environmental cleanup and treatment of pollution-related illnesses. Yet these businesses are considered essential and good economic growth opportunities because they kill us physically and not morally, assuming we all have the same moral standards as Mr. Glendening).

If the governor wants to take a stand on slot machines, however, why not take action on the thousands of gaming machines in local bars?

Fred Metschulat

Baltimore

Parental guidance needed to help teach pupils to read

The Sun's editorial "Teaching the teachers more about reading" (June 19) is certainly commendable for its foresight in noting that beefing up the level of reading instruction knowledge for future and present teachers is a "no-brainer." Why? Because, as is stated, "it makes sense to expect that colleges and universities will give future teachers the training" required to ensure the literacy of their students.

There is a dimension, however, that our educators and curriculum planners seem to overlook: There are significant differences among elementary students in lower grades because the environments in which they are reared.

Education, particularly during early childhood, involves a proper coordination of parents and educators. When the imbalance between parental responsibility and that of educators becomes critical, the educator is confronted with an impossible task to teach effectively.

In that context, the child in one environment probably remains with an inherent inability to read and comprehend effectively, in contrast to another reared in a different environment.

Some youngsters have been provided with much-needed parental supervision, and the child's learning ability is in balance with the mission of the educators.

Our society should being solving the Reading by 9 issue by adopting the methods we used in the past.

Sy Steinberg

Baltimore

The Maryland State Board of Education is well-intentioned in moving to require reading instruction to ensure that all teachers have the knowledge needed to teach reading, but in some instances it will be a waste of time and/or money.

Many experienced teachers did have excellent instruction in the teaching of reading. It would be a waste of their time and money (and a waste of taxpayer money when teachers request their reimbursement money) to take a course or courses in reading instruction. For experienced teachers, require a performance exam. Teachers who fail could be required to take courses in which they lack knowledge. Those who pass it could devote their time elsewhere.

Why do so many people think that there is one simple solution that fits all?

Karen Gronau

Perry Hall

Teacher's influence could end up turning around pupil

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.