Tenn. governor questions clean-air demands He says federal standards would reduce jobs there

other states join fight


NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- The battle over new clean air requirements has turned nasty in the South.

Upset at the Environmental Protection Agency's call for Tennessee to reduce smog emissions that harm Northeastern states, the governor of Tennessee said the changes would reduce jobs in his state and questioned whether federal data prove that the changes would result in significantly cleaner air downwind.

The proposal amounts to "Big Brother coming down here and throwing a bunch of data at us that will harm our state," said Gov. Donald Sundquist, a Republican. He said his state should treat the proposed requirements the way American revolutionaries treated British tea in the 1773 Boston Tea Party and "dump in the harbor the data that's questionable."

The heated words amount to the latest skirmish in a long battle between Northeastern states and those in the South and Midwest over an EPA proposal to use a regional approach to reduce smog.

Earlier last week, Sundquist and nine other governors sent a letter to President Clinton objecting to technical merits of the agency's approach and asking for more time to study local pollution patterns. The letter was also signed by the governors of West Virginia, Alabama, Kentucky, South Carolina, Virginia, Ohio, Indiana, Michigan and Illinois.

The agency defended its proposal. "Our agency and the states conducted more than 1,000 hours of public meetings, and we conducted more than two years of technical analysis," said David Ryan, an agency spokesman. "We think it is a good proposal."

Environmentalists said Tennesseans would be hurt most by the state's resistance because many benefits of cleaner air would be felt close to home. "What they're doing is really shortchanging their own citizens and the health of their own population," said Mamatha B. Gowda, a specialist in the ozone transport rules at the Sierra Club in Washington.

Sundquist's top policy aide, Justin P. Wilson, elaborated on Tennessee's objections, saying, "We don't need an arbitrary government promulgating intolerable acts for economic protection of a New England that can no longer compete."

He accused Northeastern states of unfairly trying to shift expensive environmental cleanup responsibilities to other states to protect local companies. "They see electric deregulation coming and know their power companies can't compete" with the Tennessee Valley Authority, Wilson said.

The EPA disputed Tennessee's contention that the proposed changes favor New England states. "We did not let the Northeastern states off the hook," Ryan said. "We're not out to get any states."

The agency called in November for 22 states and the District of Columbia to make plans to meet the Clean Air Act's requirements that the states and the district reduce smog-producing emissions. Tennessee would be required to reduce nitrogen oxides emissions by 35 percent under the proposal. Reduction targets for the other states and the District of Columbia would range from 9 percent to 44 percent.

The main sources of smog, or ground-level ozone, are emissions from automobiles, power plants and factories.

While both Sundquist and Wilson said the plan would cost jobs for Tennesseans, neither said he could estimate how many. But Wilson said complying with the agency's call for changes would halt the state's economic growth after 2007.

Pub Date: 3/15/98

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.