Tupac Amaru I in the 16th century and Tupac Amaru II in...

On the other hand ...

December 20, 1996|By Dan Berger

Tupac Amaru I in the 16th century and Tupac Amaru II in the 18th century were lost causes who caused mischief. It is fair to infer what Trey is about.

Show no sympathy. The top FBI guy working for the Russians should have known a top KGB guy was helping our side.

Mobutu Sese Seko heard of a part of Zaire he hadn't stolen and went back for it.

So long, Ed-die, it was good to see you again.

Pub Date: 12/20/96

Joe Flacco's amazing wedding photos are out on the Internet

Meteorologist Bernadette Woods says she is leaving WJZ-TV

Hernias in women can be hard to diagnose

MORE:

Preakness analysis and betting tips

Trees in containers can liven up a patio, so long as you know the basics

For kitchen, use paint colors that are warm, inviting

One winning ticket in Florida for $590.5 million Powerball prize

Compact, cheaper living in 'tiny houses'

WWE Extreme Rules features no contest for WWE title, big night for The Shield

|

|

|

Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.