Missing the points Basketball: There's no shortage of theories on why the NBA has been showing a precipitous decline in scoring.

December 15, 1996|By Jerry Bembry | Jerry Bembry,SUN STAFF

For those who have gotten their thrills in NBA games from watching teams score points in bunches, the Orlando Magic -- in the two seasons before this one -- was the team to watch. Two years ago, the team's average of 110.9 points a game led the league. Last year, Orlando's 104.5 points per game put it second only to the NBA champion Chicago Bulls.

All of which made the night of Dec. 4 difficult to stomach for Magic fans. That night against the Cleveland Cavaliers, the Magic could manage just 57 points -- the lowest-scoring performance since the 24-second shot clock was introduced in the 1954-55 season.

"Record?" Magic guard Gerald Wilkins said after the game. "I didn't know we set a record."

Wilkins may not need to worry long about the dubious distinction. The way NBA teams are scoring this season, , that record is in danger.

Or maybe "not scoring" is a better choice of words. Entering Friday's games, the 29 teams in the NBA were averaging 94.2 points per game -- the lowest average since the 1954-55 season.

In a league in which the scoring average had once reached as high as 118.8 points per game (1961-62 season), last season was the first time in 39 years that it had dropped below 100 points.

Last season was also the first in the shot-clock era in which a team had failed to average at least 90 points (Vancouver averaged 89.8.). Going into last night's games, there were five teams (Atlanta, Cleveland, Orlando, San Antonio and Vancouver) scoring below 90 points a game, and several others were precariously close.

So why -- in this day and age when the athletes are considered bigger, stronger, more athletic and better skilled, when the NBA is reaching worldwide popularity and when attendance numbers have reportedly increased -- can't players score? Why is it almost normal now to see teams score in the 70s?

It all depends on whom you ask.

Dearth of talent?

There are quite a few older players, led by the always vocal Charles Barkley, who subscribe to the theory of "they can't play the game," meaning that a lot of the up-and-coming athletes who are considered to be the league's future don't have a clue about the fundamentals of basketball.

"It's expansion. The league is getting younger and they play basketball -- but they don't know how to play basketball," said Barkley, a Houston Rockets All-Star forward. "People seem to think that just because you play basketball that you can play."

Consider the shooting accuracy of some of the "young stars" entering last night: Jason Kidd was making 36.5 percent, Jamal Mashburn 34.2, Nick Van Exel 39.9, Isaiah Rider 40.6, Stephon Marbury 37.1 and Sam Cassell 41.0.

Also playing a role is the expansion that has added six teams during the past seven years, leading to a dilution in talent.

Said Detroit Pistons coach Doug Collins: "With expansion and so many teams now, you have a roster of players who can't score."

To support Collins' claim, one needs to look no further than this season's New Jersey Nets, a team with just one regular -- Shawn Bradley -- who is shooting better than 44.0 percent. As a team, the Nets are shooting 40.5 percent from the field, and had to wait until the 16th game of the season before they shot better than 50 percent (51.2 percent in Wednesday's victory over Seattle).

Moving in the three-point arc from 23 feet, 9 inches to 22 feet before the 1994-95 season has also had an effect, and now more big men are launching from long distance. Chris Webber, in his rookie season with Golden State, missed all 14 of his three-point attempts. A year later, playing in just 54 games with Washington, Webber had 145 attempts.

Movement hasn't helped

Player movement during the summer via the free-agent and trade routes, as well as injuries, also have played roles in the decreased scoring. For some teams, the first month of the season was nothing more than an extension of training camp.

The New York Knicks, Washington Bullets and Denver Nuggets each had seven new faces on their opening-night rosters. The Phoenix Suns and Dallas Mavericks were breaking in five new players. With that much movement, teams have suffered a lack of continuity, leading to sloppy play.

"We're not familiar with each other," said Denver coach Dick Motta. "I would say that's been the biggest stumbling block for us."

On the other hand, the four top-scoring teams in the league -- Houston, Chicago, Seattle and Utah -- have remained intact, or at least managed to keep their key players.

"It's no coincidence about the teams that are playing well," Rockets guard Clyde Drexler said. "I think of the teams doing well, a lot of them had little change and also have some pretty good, consistent veteran leadership."

Added Charlotte coach Dave Cowens: "Teams that are together longer know each other. You don't hear about Chicago having a tough time scoring."

Injuries to David Robinson (San Antonio), Anfernee Hardaway and Dennis Scott (Orlando), Rik Smits (Indiana) and Gheorghe Muresan (Washington) also have hurt their respective teams.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.