HTS unfairTo date, the only justification offered by HTS...

LETTERS

February 11, 1996

HTS unfair

To date, the only justification offered by HTS for the blindsiding of local hero John Lowenstein is his time removed from the game. Excuse us? Today's owners seem hellbent on destroying the traditions that are baseball, but the game has not really changed that radically since Dr. Longball last made a house call to 33rd Street.

HTS has said that subscriber input will not affect its decision. Then again, Paul Tagliabue told us to build a museum because the NFL game would never again be played here. . . . We guess not all decisions are etched in stone.

Daniel Reed

Baltimore

Lowenstein was fun

Orioles TV broadcasts without a main part of the award-winning HTS telecast? No more John Lowenstein there to tell us like it is, with an entertaining blend of humor and baseball savvy?

As much as I am looking forward to the baseball season, this is a huge blow to my eagerness.

Jack Jenkins III

Hagerstown

Why make change?

We watch Orioles games on HTS and really enjoy the comments and the comedy of John Lowenstein. He has always been one of the biggest reasons to watch. Why in the world would they want to change something that is so enjoyable?

Mary E. Warfield

Baltimore

Reconsider

Here is an error that can be corrected. HTS has some time to reconsider its decision to remove John Lowenstein from Orioles telecasts in 1996.

Although Jim Palmer and Mike Flanagan are qualified for such a position from a technical standpoint, they do not fill the bill from the entertainment perspective. Lowenstein does it all!

Joseph Evelius

Baltimore

Palmer no improvement

I felt the chemistry between Mel Proctor and John Lowenstein on HTS was wonderful. Lowenstein was insightful, witty and more importantly, knew when to "commence verbalizing." This is a phrase that does not exist in Jim Palmer's mind-set.

Let's see how many times Palmer can observe a play on the field and relate that incident to something that occurred during his playing days. You'll need a separate score card to tally how many times he uses his favorite words: "I," "me" and "my."

Patrick R. Lynch

Baltimore

Get rid of DH

Baseball's officialdom committed a momentous error in 1973, when it established the designated hitter rule for, curiously, the American League only.

The approval of regular-season interleague play beginning in 1997 presented the perfect opportunity to correct a 23-year imbalance by abolishing the DH. Instead, the DH rule will be in effect in American League ballparks and eliminated in National League parks.

The most formidable decision a manager faces is whether to pinch-hit for his pitcher in the late innings of a close game. Since 1973, AL managers have been exempt from those tough calls.

Alan D. Mason

Bethesda

Baseball suggestions

For more changes, baseball should introduce the DH in the National League, shorten the season to 154 games and do away with the stupid wild-card playoffs. The proposed interleague play will stimulate the dwindling attendance. No more strikes, to make amends to the suffering fans. On doubleheaders, the second game should be played in seven innings.

Joseph T. Kasprzak

Baltimore

We welcome your letters. They should include your name, address and a daytime telephone number. We edit letters for length and clarity when necessary. Send them to:

Sports Department

The Baltimore Sun

501 N. Calvert St.

Baltimore, Md. 21278-0001

Or fax us your letter:(410) 783-2518

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.