Will moving the poor make a difference? Debate rages as moving the poor shows good results

February 04, 1996|By James Bock

BEHIND A controversial plan that would enable poor black Baltimore families to move to middle-class, majority-white areas, there is a simple idea: Living in more affluent neighborhoods can help people escape poverty.

The plan touched off a political uproar in Baltimore County last fall when it was proposed to settle a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland on behalf of black public housing tenants. The suit alleges that Baltimore and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) have illegally segregated black tenants for six decades.

The Baltimore plan -- and nearly a dozen other "housing mobility" programs nationwide that move poor people to middle-income areas at government expense -- is modeled after a Chicago program that since 1981 has helped 6,500 poor black families relocate, mostly to predominantly white suburbs.

Evidence from Chicago shows that moving to the suburbs pays off.

The children of families who moved to the suburbs did much better than those who relocated to often-poor Chicago neighborhoods, according to research by James E. Rosenbaum of Northwestern University.

However, researchers agree that much work remains to be done on the neighborhood effect.

"Most researchers feel intuitively that neighborhoods should make a difference. But when it comes to measuring those impacts, it is difficult to do so," said Sandra J. Newman of the Johns Hopkins University Institute for Policy Studies. "The results are rather mixed and inconclusive."

Dr. Rosenbaum compared families that relocated in Chicago (often in poor neighborhoods) under the mobility program with those who moved to largely white suburbs. He found that while mothers who relocated in the suburbs were more likely to be hired, their jobs paid no better on average than jobs held by mothers who stayed in the city.

But the children who moved to the suburbs showed impressive gains: They were more likely to finish high school, go to a four-year college or get good jobs. They made friends with white peers and, although there were incidents of racial hostility, "it wasn't like they were ostracized or isolated," Dr. Rosenbaum said.

"The results from Chicago are extremely positive and very strong. The magnitude of effects is very great. It's quite impressive," he said.

The research in Chicago's Gautreaux program (named for a public housing tenant who filed a desegregation lawsuit) did not measure what percentage of families abandoned the suburbs. Other researchers say the Gautreaux results may be distorted because families who moved to the suburbs were highly motivated to succeed and might have done well elsewhere.

While the academic debate is unresolved, the mobility strategy has gained support as a way to make subsidized housing effective. Both public housing projects and the normal Section 8 rental certificate program have been blamed for clustering the -- American "underclass" instead of breaking the cycle of poverty.

Between 1970 and 1990, according to HUD, the number of people living in high-poverty neighborhoods nearly tripled, to 10.4 million.

The Baltimore plan follows two trends in favor among Clinton administration policy-makers: It gives most tenants rental certificates instead of building new public housing, and it tries to break up concentrations of poverty by ensuring that families don't simply move from one poor neighborhood to another.

Government shutdowns, snowstorms and the holidays have held the plan's completion, lawyers for the parties say. It is under review by the Justice Department.

But the plan's main elements are not expected to change: More than 2,000 black public-housing families would move over the next six years, often to suburban counties. About 1,342 families would receive rental certificates for private-market housing. Another 814 families would be placed in scattered, subsidized units, some earmarked for homeownership.

The plan, in an effort to avoiding reconcentrating the poor and resegregating black families, would exclude certain areas for public-housing tenants who chose to move. Any census tract with 26 percent or more minority population, a poverty rate over 10 percent or more than 5 percent of subsidized housing units would be off limits.

Poverty should not be an insurmountable problem in the Baltimore region, said David Rusk, author of "Baltimore Unbound," a recent book about combating Baltimore's poverty.

For every 100 persons in the Baltimore metropolitan area, four whites and six blacks are poor on average, Mr. Rusk said. But while three of every four poor whites live in middle-class neighborhoods (usually in the suburbs), three of every four poor blacks are trapped in high-poverty wastelands.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.