Hondurans debate amnesty for officers 10 tied to rights abuses by Battalion 316 in '80s

October 17, 1995|By GINGER THOMPSON | GINGER THOMPSON,SUN FOREIGN STAFF

TEGUCIGALPA, Honduras -- The most talked about issue on this country's popular Radio America call-in show these days is the investigation of 10 military officers accused of human rights abuses during the 1980s, when a CIA-trained military unit called Battalion 316 was kidnapping, torturing and murdering suspected subversives.

Carlos Lopez Osorio, lead attorney for the accused officers, calls in. "My clients should be pardoned!" he insists, invoking a 1991 amnesty decree that pardons political crimes. "This whole trial is illegal!"

Relatives of the battalion's victims call in. They demand that the military not be pardoned.

"They must never have amnesty," says Fidelina Perez, whose son Samuel disappeared and is considered a victim of Battalion 316. "They never gave amnesty to the people they held prisoner in their clandestine jails."

The case has reached a critical juncture. The debate is intense. The divisions are as deep and as passionate as they were more than a decade ago when this impoverished Central American country was the staging ground for the Reagan administration's clandestine war against communism in the region.

Honduras seems closer than it or most Latin American countries have ever been to unmasking and punishing military men responsible for torturing and killing their own countrymen, closer to finding out what happened to 184 people still listed as "disappeared." Closer, too, to uncovering the details of the U.S. government's complicity in those crimes.

But at the same time, the Honduran government appears closer to closing the case against 10 officers already accused. The move would effectively end any chance to prosecute other military officers accused of human rights abuses during the so-called "dark decade" of the 1980s.

1991 amnesty

That could happen if the attorney Mr. Lopez wins his argument that the 1991 amnesty covers the military as well as suspected subversives.

"I feel that the government is positioning itself to give the officers amnesty," said Bertha Oliva, spokeswoman for the Committee for the Relatives of the Disappeared.

"If that happens, the search for the truth will be over. Why go on exhuming bodies and looking for evidence if military officials win amnesty?"

Ms. Oliva, whose husband, Thomas Nativi, disappeared at the hands of Battalion 316 in 1981, added: "For many people, an amnesty will send the message that nothing has changed. There will always be impunity for those in power."

Mr. Lopez is waging a battle against Honduran Judge Roy Medina, who wants the 10 men to answer questions about their roles in the kidnapping and torture of six university students in 1981.

Judge Medina had given the men until last Friday to appear, but the summons was extended until later this week.

The case against the 10 is only the first in what is supposed to be a full-blown investigation of human rights abuses committed by Battalion 316.

The 10 present and former Honduran military men accused in the current case include Col. Amilcar Zelaya, a former member of the military junta that governed Honduras in 1979, and Col. Alexander Hernandez, a high-level official in the Honduran police force alleged to have been the commander of Battalion 316.

'Amnesty does not apply'

Deputy Attorney General Rene Velasquez, who was illegally detained and tortured by the Honduran military during the 1980s, said the 1991 amnesty decree should be applied only to those who committed politically motivated crimes against the state, not military personnel acting on behalf of the state.

"The amnesty does not apply to them," he said.

But Mr. Velasquez conceded that if this case fails and the officers are granted amnesty, it is unlikely that other cases will be pursued.

The action against the officers began one month after The Sun published a four-part series reporting that the CIA and the State Department collaborated with Battalion 316.

The series revealed that U.S. officials knew of the battalion's abuses but deliberately misled the Congress about the violence to maintain public support for the Reagan administration's war against communism in Central America.

U.S. documents sought

The Honduran government has asked the Clinton administration declassify more documents about the relationship, and the administration promised last week to speed up the process.

But Leo Valladares, the Honduran government's human rights commissioner leading the campaign to get those documents, says that if the case in Honduras stalls or fails, that could reduce Washington's incentive to cooperate.

"If the pressure to get at the truth diminishes in Honduras, then surely that will be a relief to the U.S. government," he said.

The Honduran military has made it clear that it would like nothing better.

The accused soldiers' attorney has told Judge Medina that his clients don't have to answer questions.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.