There's no need to travel to see EMG's 'reality'In a...

the Forum

July 21, 1995

There's no need to travel to see EMG's 'reality'

In a recent article about Educational Management Group Inc., the company seeking a $5 million no-bid contract from Baltimore County schools, teacher Daniel Scroggs said that EMG's technology "can send students on virtual field trips without leaving the classroom" ("Board questions value of 'virtual field trips'," July 12).

If that is the case, why couldn't EMG have sent Baltimore County school administrators on a "virtual field trip" to the Super Bowl? Most of us watched it on low-tech televisions.

As a Baltimore County teacher, if I wanted my students to learn about the Bahamas, EMG would do a satellite linkup, and we'd watch it on a monitor. Why do top school administrators need to fly to those beaches to hear "live" sales presentations?

Let EMG use its own technology to give its "virtual sales pitches" in Towson. Then we'll see how many administrators line up at board meetings to fight for EMG.

Ken Shapiro

Baltimore

Generous side

Just a short point about the meaning of charity, prompted by William Safire's July 6 Other Voices column.

The basics required for human existence -- food, shelter, health care -- belong to the citizens of the world by right, because they are human.

Therefore, justice demands that people have the means to secure these necessities of life. Those without means include those who are elderly, infirm, disabled, very young and certainly the unemployed in an economy built on 6 percent unemployment.

When the government provides welfare, that is justice, not charity. Justice is mandatory.

Charity, on the other hand, is voluntary. And in our book, we don't distinguish between "the deserving" and "the undeserving."

We'd like to err on the generous side.

Rev. Fred Kammer, S.J.

Alexandria, Va.

The writer is president, Catholic Charities USA.

GOP being mean

Someone was buying stamps the other day at the Belair post office, and the clerk gave him a book of stamps that had pictures of Richard Nixon on them.

The buyer asked if there were other stamps he could get. The clerk retorted, "Anybody whose picture is on the stamps is better than who we have in the White House right now."

That kind of mentality floors me. President Clinton is a much better president than some we've had in the recent past.

It is the Democratic-bashing that the Republicans have been waging since the last election that is aiding in dividing the country this way. Republicans have been downright mean.

They say the president is weak and ineffective, yet they blame him for everything that goes wrong.

Even when he does something they like, they say that he is finally listening to the Republicans and don't give him credit.

For example, a person in the unemployment office the other day trying to get an extension of his benefits was told that there were no more extensions. The person automatically blamed the president when in reality it was the Republican Congress that did this.

Granted, Mr. Clinton is no saint, but what president has been? He has pushed for the crime bill, which Republicans watered down by giving block grants.

He has been decent with environmental legislation, reforming the way federal government does business by streamlining regulations and manuals and forming a team structure. He tried to do something about health care, but the Republicans shot him down.

The Republicans should lighten up. They not only are making themselves look bad by all this bashing and meanness, they are also doing a great disservice to the American people by dividing us into hate groups.

Rochelle Bellman

Bel Air

National lottery

With the national budget a problem and the budgets of social programs being paired back, we need another source of income -- a national lottery.

A national lottery would help some of these problems. How does a five-year plan sound?

Jack Wallace

Dayton

Clarke has fans

I am writing regarding the July 12 article, "A difference of degree in mayoral campaign," about mayoral candidates Mary Pat Clarke and Kurt L. Schmoke.

I'd like to correct some wrong information.

Reporters Joanna Daemmrich and Eric Siegel said many of the unions and other civic clubs have yet to make endorsements, but that Mr. Schmoke has some already.

I would like to note that Mrs. Clarke also has some endorsements (which Clarke campaign officials failed to mention to the reporters) and wide support from community organizations such as the Morrell Park Democratic Club, which announced its position in the early summer.

In addition, she has historically had union support.

Mrs. Clarke has received wide support from the citizens she visits every day.

She is well received in every area of the city, which is as important as an endorsement from an organization.

Proof of her support includes the numerous volunteers who help her every day.

In addition, the enormous number of large signs and smaller window signs all over the city prove her support base of citizens is strong.

Mrs. Clarke has a clear and outlined plan on education, crime and jobs for the city.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.