Winners And Losers

June 11, 1995|By Brad Snyder

To avoid hiring a real commissioner to solve baseball's plethora of problems, baseball czar Bud Selig endorsed an Angelosian idea at Wednesday's owners meeting -- build new, publicly-funded ballparks in 11 major league cities. Will these new facilities cure baseball's ills? This week's selection is an unscientific analysis of the franchises with the most recenltly-built ballparks.

Colorado Rockies -- UP -- The facade of Coors Field looks like Ebbets Field. The difference is the Rockies aren't playing like bums.

Texas Rangers -- WHO KNOWS -- Johnny Oates + new stadium = division title? Their pitching won't hold up, the glass windows in the outfield form a terrible hitter's background, but a division title would make up for years of being in the Cowboys' shadow.

Cleveland Indians -- UP -- This place is supposedly better than Camden Yards. The ballclub is definitely better than the Orioles. The Indians owe it all to Hank Peters.

Orioles -- WHO KNOWS -- The crowds are thinning, the owner is hurting and the team is floundering. Things would turn around if they went back to their old ticket exchange policy.

Chicago White Sox -- DOWN -- This is the Edsel of new stadiums. It's a shame we can't bring back the old ballpark, the old owner (Bill Veeck) and the old hitter (Julio Franco) behind Frank Thomas.

Toronto Blue Jays -- WHO KNOWS -- The ballpark is too futuristic, the team is getting old, but it's still the most respected organization in the game. Pat Gillick for commissioner.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.