Federal employeesIn his May 26 letter, William Baker of...

the Forum

June 01, 1995

Federal employees

In his May 26 letter, William Baker of Homestead has suggested that federal employees and members of Congress should have their salaries and pensions cut. I agree with him about the congressional pensions as they have no real connection to amount and time contributed.

However, I strongly disagree with his suggestion where it applies to federal employees. In spite of what Mr. Baker has been led to believe, the average federal employee does not receive large salaries or pensions. Reports in the media to the contrary, the average employee receives salaries and pensions at about the same level of pay as the average office worker. The salaries and pensions reported in the paper as ''average'' include the salaries of upper level administrators and assistants. That is similar to an office's including the salaries of the chairman of the board and the vice president of the company when speaking of ''average'' salaries.

For years federal employees have paid a higher rate on total salary toward their pension. Social Security payments were at a lower rate and there was a cap on the salary taxed. There was no such cap for federal employees. Whenever the president or Congress wants a scapegoat they use the federal employee in Grades 2-15 as their scapegoat. The average employee is hard-working for 40 hours per week, has two to three weeks of vacation, no overtime and must have proof of illness to collect sick time. Frequently they work in buildings that are impressive on the outside but dingy and overcrowded on the inside. They don't deserve the treatment they are getting at the hands of Congress or the general public as represented by Mr. Baker.

And, no, I am not a federal employee or pensioner. I know people who are.

B. Frank

Severn

School before work

On April 27, employers held Take your Son/Daughter to Work Day and welcomed students who visited with their parents. This wonderful activity was to educate and introduce youngsters to the work world and let them see their parents in their job situations. This activity was successful for the employers, but there were problems created by absenteeism in the schools that need to be considered for next year.

Many classrooms had only a few students, thereby altering the teaching curriculum. Some students simply stayed home.

There was the monumental task of changing a student's attendance from absent to present if he had participated in this non-school-related function. My school alone had over 300 students to participate.

In the future, would employers please consider scheduling this activity on a non-school day, possibly during the summer months?

Carole L. Owings

Baltimore

Sweep some more

I have seen clean-up efforts come and go in the city. I can't count the number of times I have participated in my Govans neighborhood. The recent inspection blitz here found me warmly applauding this latest effort to maintain property values. My hope was that the Clean Sweep program would have Baltimore living up to its responsibilities.

Our March Clean Sweep, however, accomplished nothing but the bulk trash removal. I couldn't believe that in an election year the mayor would let himself look this bad. April's Clean Sweep was no better. It was then that we found out that we had to list every storm drain we wanted cleaned, every light pole for graffiti removal, etc.

Though disappointed that we were not informed of this from the beginning, we complied. My association filed more than 75 complaints and made photocopies to check progress. We needn't have bothered. Our May Clean Sweep was as big a success as the ones in March and April. Not a single new complaint that we had filed was resolved.

All I can say is that after 14 years of residency in Baltimore and eight years with him as mayor, Kurt Schmoke doesn't make me proud.

Dennis Propalis

Baltimore

Need those weeds

Flooding and tornadoes seem to become more frequent every year. Now there is a movement in Washington to weaken our already fragile environmental laws. The legislators behind this should realize that cutting down trees, weeds and shrubbery for developments requires the pouring of concrete and asphalt that take away Mother Nature's natural ability to absorb rain water. Rain water pours into storm drains that flow into creeks and rivers that overflow. And the more trees you cut down the more open spaces you have to spawn tornadoes.

The same principles apply to people who build on certain hillsides. The loss of trees, weeds and shrubbery and the pouring of concrete and asphalt can lead to mudslides such as those that have been plaguing the hillsides in California.

Some of our lawmakers, not only in Washington but also at the state and local levels, should come out of the Stone Age and emerge into an enlightened 20th century that finds the publishers of the National Geographic, the Sierra Club and Greenpeace at the forefront of trying to save our planet from unscrupulous developers and politicians.

Albert Antonelli

Baltimore

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.