Schmoke's intervention in schools stirs questions

March 20, 1995|By Jean Thompson and JoAnna Daemmrich | Jean Thompson and JoAnna Daemmrich,Sun Staff Writers

For the past three weeks, even as Baltimore officials publicly celebrated signs of progress in their fight to resuscitate the beleaguered education system, they were anguishing over a new round of crises.

The anxiety at school headquarters and City Hall spilled over Thursday when Mayor Kurt L. Schmoke intervened to shore up an education system that appears under siege.

A federal judge had raised the possibility of shifting the schools out of the city's control. Skeptical state legislators had threatened to block millions in school aid. And a new report had called into question the progress of Baltimore's best-known school privatization experiment.

Mr. Schmoke, who has insisted on playing a prominent role in shaping local education policy, ordered changes to overhaul special education programs and to renegotiate the contract with Education Alternatives Inc. But his move has raised broader questions.

One is whether his superintendent, Dr. Walter G. Amprey, can lead the school system out of an 11-year-old federal suit alleging the district fails to serve disabled children. Another is whether the mayor acted to deflect criticism of EAI in an election year, or whether he has lost faith in the company's efforts to manage the nine "Tesseract" schools.

The most pressing matter is whether Mr. Schmoke will be successful in settling the special education lawsuit that threatens his control of the schools.

"I had to send a signal about special education, that I felt a sense of urgency about it," Mr. Schmoke said Friday. "If the school system were put in receivership because of special education, the parents and teachers and all others would assume there were problems with the whole school system."

One key move was to shift control of special education from Dr. Amprey to a deputy superintendent, who will report directly to the mayor. Right now, the programs, which serve about 17 percent of the district's 113,000 children, are run by two school departments and overseen by a court-appointed management team and a monitor.

Mr. Schmoke said he decided to order the reorganization after learning of the threat of losing the schools to a court-appointed manager, possibly Nancy S. Grasmick, state superintendent of schools. Attorneys at the Maryland Disability Law Center, which represents plaintiffs in the lawsuit, have drafted a request for such a manager but have not filed it in court; their next meeting with the judge is scheduled for Tuesday.

The lawsuit also has been a financial drain on the city. Just since 1989, it has cost some $1.8 million in court expenses, legal fees and the price of the monitor.

In recent weeks, the mayor had a chance to savor some educational successes -- test scores and attendance rates showed districtwide improvement.

Yet at the same time, he received EAI's own report that it has not boosted student attendance and reading scores at the schools it runs. And it was becoming clear that despite improvements made in special education services, problems persisted: In November, Dr. Amprey had been held in contempt of court for not complying with an order to report formally on the school system's shortcomings in special education.

Worried that his superintendent "appears to have lost credibility with the federal court," and frustrated by the drawn-out suit, Mr. Schmoke decided to make bold changes, such as choosing the new deputy.

"I want him [Dr. Amprey] to be an effective superintendent, and he sure couldn't be while he [was] being held in contempt of court," Mr. Schmoke said. He acknowledged the move would create a little awkwardness, but said he hopes it will resolve the special education crisis and "allow Dr. Amprey to focus in on the rest of the system."

Dr. Amprey expressed support of the mayor's actions, noting there were few options.

"Nothing about it impugns my ego or strikes a negative against me," he said. "There are issues now that I probably cannot overcome on my own, including the issues around the legislators withholding money from the schools and the federal judge holding me in contempt."

In addition to ordering the changes in special education last week, the mayor called for revising the controversial, five-year EAI contract. That agreement must hold EAI to measurable standards, including better student scores, he said.

Both moves came as state legislators voted to withhold about $6 million, earmarked for administrative expenses, until Dr. Amprey reforms school management.

"He recognizes our school system is under siege, and what this superintendent right now needs is cover," Dr. Amprey said. "This mayor tries to provide that cover."

However, Dr. Amprey continues to disagree with his boss over the emphasis put on measuring school success by test scores. "We've oversold the public on the importance and the finality of standardized test scores. They're unfair," he said.

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.