(Page 2 of 2)

'Just Cause' is a liberal dose of inverted politics

February 17, 1995|By Stephen Hunter | Stephen Hunter,Sun Film Critic

Glimcher, who has a fine sense of milieu and truly captures the seediness of Ocochobee, hasn't much luck with action; it's all banal and predictable. Worse yet, wasn't Scorsese in the same jungle in his liberal deconstruction movie, "Cape Fear," just a few years ago?

Other flaws intrude. There's a planted murder weapon and for the life of me, I cannot figure out who, by the very logic of the plot, could have planted it. In fact, generally, there's too much plot: A connection to Connery's wife is forced and a degradation worked upon a prisoner feels unbelievable.

Finally there's Connery himself. Hulking and radiating strength, he never really seems comfortable with the part of a man of passionate ideals but little practical skill, though almost certainly it was his commitment to it that got the movie made. But he never transcends his screen persona to become something new. I kept thinking how much more believable it would have been with someone other than a tattooed (Scotland Forever!) ex-Royal Navy Mr. Universe contestant, with a cinema baggage of three decades of mayhem behind him. James Bond, a liberal? Give me break!

"Just Cause"

Starring Sean Connery and Laurence Fishburne

Directed by Arne Glimcher

Released by Warner Bros.

Rated R (extreme sexual violence, profanity)

** 1/2

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.