Road improvement taxes survive court appeal

October 09, 1994|By Mike Farabaugh | Mike Farabaugh,Sun Staff Writer

The Maryland Court of Appeals last week set aside a Court of Special Appeals ruling that the assessments property owners and developers pay Harford County for future road improvements are an illegal tax.

Richard K. Jacobsen, a Baltimore attorney representing property owners in the suit against the county in 1991, said the Court of Appeals decision to vacate the lower court's ruling means the case will "begin all over again at the county level."

The property owners, Joseph J. Wielepski of the 3600 block of Day Road in Darlington and his brother and sister-in-law, Stanley and Janet Wielepski of the 3500 block of Day Road, first sought to subdivide their land into home lots in 1991.

While they were obtaining county approvals, the Wielepskis learned that 1990 subdivision regulations required that anyone subdividing land into more than five lots pay for road improvements. The county said the work would cost $97,000.

Since that pushed development costs above the market value of their land, the Wielepskis abandoned the project and began a series of appeals.

After failing to gain satisfaction at the county level, the Wielepskis filed suit in Harford Circuit Court in February 1993. That court upheld the county's position.

The Wielepskis appealed again to the Court of Special Appeals, which ruled that the assessments constitute an illegal tax. County officials appealed that decision to the state's highest court.

After the favorable ruling Jan. 5, the Wielepskis filed a class-action suit in Circuit Court seeking compensation for all yet-to-be-named property owners who either paid the alleged illegal tax or were forced to drop plans to subdivide because of it.

Court of Appeals judges vacated the Jan. 5 decision because attorneys for both sides agree that administrative procedures were not followed by the county or the plaintiffs.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.