Shift would end Baltimore's hopes

December 08, 1993|By Jon Morgan | Jon Morgan,Staff Writer Staff writer Vito Stellino contributed to this article.

A move by the Washington Redskins to Laurel effectively would end Baltimore's long effort to lure a team back to the city.

Although league bylaws no longer prohibit a team from entering another team's market, neither the league nor another team is likely to set up shop at Camden Yards -- the downtown area city planners have dreamed someday would house both the Orioles and the NFL -- if there is a team at Laurel.

"When you have one team 30 miles away, that's a little rough," said Gov. William Donald Schaefer, who has been trying to lure a team to Baltimore since the Colts moved to Indianapolis in 1984.

(The Laurel site actually is about 14 miles from Baltimore.)

San Francisco 49ers president Carmen Policy agreed, saying: "Let me put it to you this way. If I were part of the management group running a team and I were looking to move, first of all, I'd be reluctant to move anywhere within 45 miles of another NFL team."

Even a Redskins fan, Howard County Council Chairman C. Vernon Gray, could see that this move wouldn't help Baltimore.

"This would conclusively preclude Baltimore from ever getting a team," he said.

Mr. Schaefer said Redskins owner Jack Kent Cooke told NFL commissioner Paul Tagliabue of the Laurel plan before the owners voted for a second expansion team last week, which Mr. Schaefer says hurt Baltimore's chances.

"I didn't work for nine years for Mr. Cooke all of a sudden to say, 'I'm going to move to Laurel.' We had always gone on the presumption it was going to be in Baltimore. Baltimore. Period."

Baltimore Sun Articles
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.