Charles Theater unable to pay rent, may close Movie house cites decline in audience

November 18, 1993|By Stephen Hunter | Stephen Hunter,Film Critic

The last picture show at Baltimore's venerable Charles Theater may very well come in January.

The repertory and art film house in the 1700 block of North Charles Street, a staple in city film culture for nearly 15 years, has fallen victim to a 25 percent decline in attendance from two years ago that threatens its existence.

And although its owner won't say if the Charles is definitely closing, signs point to that ending. The theater hasn't paid rent in nine months. As of today, the Charles no longer will sell the discount ticket books that reduce prices for steady goers. And its owner has no plans to publish a January schedule, which could make "Farewell to My Concubine," the Chinese movie that opens Dec. 22, the Charles' swan song.

"Right now, the picture looks very bleak," said David Levy, the Washingtonian who has leased and run the theater since June of 1979.

According to Alan Shecter, the operating partner of Bowling Inc., the real estate firm that owns the building occupied by the Charles and much of the nearby property, "We've tried to carry it. We don't want to close it because for so long it was such a jewel. I keep hoping he can pull it out."

But Mr. Levy is pessimistic.

"It's just become too big a drain," said Mr. Levy, who also operates an art house complex in Georgetown, the four-screen Key Theater.

"I think it would be a great loss for downtown Baltimore," said Ben Ryland, the Area Advertising and Promotions Director of the Loew's Theater chain, which has risen to dominance in the Baltimore market during the past five years. "Nobody else has been able to book art films consistently except for the Baltimore Film Forum. David brings a lot of small films in for two or three days that wouldn't otherwise play here."

Creating a void

Tom Kiefaber, owner of the Senator Theater, a single-screen movie house on York Road that has cultivated a following for its art film presentations, said, "It's distressing to hear of yet another example of how the large circuits may be pushing another independent exhibitor out of theatrical film exhibition. . . . For the sake of filmgoers interested in more than 'mall-movies,' I hope he is able to stay the course."

The loss of the Charles, which plays a steady diet of "specialty films" from European or independent American sources, "would be a big void in the community," said Sharon Cohen. As president of Cohen-Johnston Advertising, a firm that represents several art film studios and distributors, she works closely with the Charles.

"Eventually, I suppose, the marketplace would restructure and maybe some other theater would emerge to offer an outlet for such product," said Ms. Cohen. "We certainly have enough population to support this kind of theater."

Nationally, the picture is bleak for art film houses.

"Today the art market is just as hit driven as the mainstream market. There's a certain number of hits -- 'The Crying Game,' 'Howards End' -- that everybody wants to see," said George Mansour, a nationally known consultant and specialty-film booker based in Boston.

"The chains have gotten into the game, and with their buying power, they're able to get the big pictures, even if in a particular city their outlet isn't as prestigious or established as the local house."

The specialty houses that survive, says Mr. Mansour, are ones that have been in place for years and that have access to huge student populations.

"It's traditional that art films play in the urban core," says Martin Zeidman, senior executive in charge of distribution for Miramax Films, a key art film distributor. "But it's a very difficult shot as far as profitability -- even in areas of greater population density."

Crime perception

According to Mr. Levy, three trends have contributed to the Charles' demise.

"Crime has had a big impact," he says. "The block started to go downhill when the Chesapeake, a seafood restaurant, closed and now people just won't go where they don't feel safe. Ironically, the crime picture around the theater has improved recently. Our worst period was two years ago when a nightclub in the same block drew a rough crowd and there were several shootings. But the perception of the crime is much more a factor than the reality."

Gary Lambert, once the theater's assistant manager and projectionist and now a consultant, also ascribed the theater's decline to crime.

"It started in 1988, when the nightclub Godfrey's opened up just down the block. There was an awful situation on the street, a real sense of menace. In that year within one block of the theater, there were seven murders. Since Godfrey's closed, there hasn't been a single shooting," said Mr. Lambert. "But the perception was established."

VCRs, competition

The second factor, Mr. Levy said, was the impact of the VCR.

Baltimore Sun Articles
|
|
|
Please note the green-lined linked article text has been applied commercially without any involvement from our newsroom editors, reporters or any other editorial staff.